Posted on 02/15/2008 2:57:49 PM PST by forkinsocket
The trial of 18 men accused of dressing up as women has started in a Sharia court in northern Nigeria. The men were arrested last year in a hotel room in the city of Bauchi.
Prosecutors read out a letter from New York based Human Rights Watch calling for the court to respect the men's right to "free association".
The men were originally accused of sodomy, which could lead to the death penalty under Sharia, but the charges were reduced.
Prosecutor Yusuf Adamu said HRW was "grossly misinformed" about the case and invited a representative of the organisation to attend the trial.
The case was adjourned until further notice by the judge.
The HRW letter was sent to the Federal Ministry of Justice in the capital, Abuja, who forwarded it on to the Bauchi state governor.
The letter said the Nigerian government had signed up to two conventions that enshrined the right to free association and freedom from harassment.
"Human Rights Watch is grossly misinformed. This case is not about the right to free association," Mr Yusuf said.
"Under Sharia law a man must dress like a man and woman must dress like a woman."
The 18 are charged with indecent dressing and vagrancy.
When the letter was read out the defendants looked relieved and happy, the BBC's Shehu Saulawa in Bauchi says.
But prosecutors have asked the court to write a response to HRW which could now delay the case.
Ancient customs
In the west, this case has focused attention on Nigerian attitudes to homosexuality, which is illegal in the country.
But the BBC's Alex Last in Nigeria says perhaps it is more a reflection of current attitudes within northern Nigeria to old local customs.
For centuries in Nigeria's Islamic north - where ethnic Hausa culture dominates - there have been men called Dan Daudu - known for dressing as women and speaking in high pitched voices.
They are largely engaged in doing what was considered to be women's' work and could sometimes be hired as entertainers for parties.
Being a Dan Daudu, however, did not necessarily say much about a person's sexual preferences, our correspondent says.
But eight years ago Nigeria's northern states reintroduced some of the harsher penalties of Islamic law which had been removed under colonialism.
It was a response by politicians to a wave of popular discontent in the Islamic north against political corruption and social injustice.
This new tougher Sharia has largely failed to end such problems but there is now, perhaps, more of a willingness to target groups who appear to behave in ways that run counter to today's more puritan practice of Islam, our correspondent says.
“reintroduced some of the harsher penalties of Islamic law which had been removed under colonialism”
All of this harsh colonialism and good colonialism gets me really confused. So again refresh my memory - Sharia law was good and British rule evil??
Do we expect the suicide-bombers to respect this rule.
Good point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.