Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Haditha film coming to Frontline on PBS [Feb 19]
Defend Our Marines ^ | February 11, 2008 | David Allender

Posted on 02/16/2008 10:25:11 AM PST by RedRover

The upcoming Frontline broadcast of “Rules of Engagement: What Really Happened in Haditha” is a major event. A co-production with Yellow River Productions, it will air February 19th at 9 p.m. ET on PBS. For the first time, television viewers will hear the facts about the incident in Haditha.

Arun Rath is the documentary’s producer, writer, and director. He took some time from a hectic postproduction schedule to talk with Defend Our Marines.

Not Murtha's version of Haditha

"I am a journalist and tend to follow world news fairly closely, but before starting work on this project all I knew about the Haditha incident was basically the headlines," Rath told me.

"When I first heard about it I thought it was interesting and counterintuitive. I knew that Marines had more intense training than our other forces, so the idea that so many would suddenly snap under pressure seemed a little strange. But I also knew that horrible things happen in wars, and figured something bad must have happened.

"Once we started to look into the story more deeply, we realized how far off the popular notion of what happened in Haditha was. For instance, the idea that there were no firefights when we know that November 19, 2005 was a day of very intense attacks across the town. We spend some time in our film spelling this out, using an interview with Major (then Captain) Jeffrey Dinsmore, the battalion's intelligence officer, to help bring that day to life. We were also able to obtain the ScanEagle video from that day. That will be eye-opening for much of our audience."

Access to major participants in the cases

"Rules of Engagement" was months in the making, and is based on unparalleled access to participants in the cases. Justin Sharratt (the first enlisted man to be exonerated of all charges) sat down for more than three hours of interviews with Rath and his crew. Kilo Company Marines and defense attorneys, free to discuss aspects of their cases that entered the public domain during the Article 32 hearings, were interviewed at length.

The result is a much-anticipated broadcast.

“Initially, we wanted to do a film about civilian casualties in Iraq,” Rath said. “There had been much talk about the battle to win hearts and minds as General Petraeus took command in Iraq, since he literally wrote the book on counterinsurgency and had talked eloquently about the importance of protecting and winning over the civilian population in such a conflict. We thought Haditha would make for an interesting case study to help us understand these issues: in addition to involving civilian deaths, much had been made of the story in the Arab media, and winning the information/PR war is also a big part of winning hearts and minds.

“But as we delved into the story of Haditha, what had happened there alone—and what was made of the story—ended up being so interesting that it, and 3/1 Kilo Company, became the topic of the entire film.”

Focus on the enlisted men

Rath is passionate about the subject, and regrets that he ended up with far more material than he could use.

"One frustration that lingers after putting this film together is how much fascinating material we had to leave out!" Rath says. "I was surprised by how hard it was to tell this story in an hour (and for TV news, that’s considered a huge amount of time).

"For instance, I interviewed General Petraeus and Marine Corps Commandant General Conway—talking mainly about the difficulties of waging counterinsurgency—but neither ended up in the final cut of the film because this turned into a story about the infantry: what the squad commanded by SSGT Wuterich went through and the aftermath more than filled the hour. For this reason, we weren’t able to get into much detail about Lt. Col. Chessani’s case, or the other officers who were initially charged.

"We were able to get great access to film training in the simulated Iraqi town created at Mojave Viper in 29 Palms, California; but while we had planned to spend a portion of the film discussing changes in training, there just wasn’t time.

"And there are even some details about the incident and legal issues that we didn’t have time to get into. We filmed an entire sequence at the assistance center in Baghdad where solatia (condolence) payments are distributed to Iraqis who have been injured or lost relatives, or even suffered property damage. It’s a pretty interesting operation, and I don’t think most Americans are aware that we even do this, let alone the scale of the operation. But again, it took us too long and too far away from our story.

"I also wish we could have aired much more of our footage from our reporter Tim Gruza’s embed with Kilo in Anbar last August— in particular the interviews, which are just amazing. And Tim did a beautiful job shooting Kilo going on patrol, there’s so much footage (in high-def no less) that’s just stunning that couldn’t make the program.

"The good side is that we were able to get some material onto the Frontline website: we’ll have extra clips of some of those interviews, as well as some of our Mojave Viper footage, and transcripts of the interviews with Generals Conway and Petraeus."

Public opinion may begin to shift

I have not seen the film, but am heartened that Rath, a public broadcasting veteran of nearly fifteen years, is striving for a fair presentation of the facts. That is all any of us in the extended Defend Our Marines community have ever asked for—and have never gotten from the mainstream media.

I asked Rath what he hoped audiences would take away from his film.

“At the most basic level,” he responded. “I hope they'll come away with a better understanding of what happened in Haditha that day. More importantly, I'm hoping that people will come away with a deeper appreciation of the extraordinarily difficult job our Marines and soldiers are undertaking in Iraq, in terms of trying to follow the Rules of Engagement in a situation where insurgents intentionally blend in with civilians.

“We end the film on the ground with Kilo company on their latest deployment, and these young men speak about the challenges they face with a thoughtfulness and eloquence that seems uncannily beyond their years (at least well beyond what I was capable of at that age). Perhaps if we can really instill in our audience a sense of what it's like to stand in those boots, there may be less of an inclination to rush to judgment the next time there are accusations of a 'massacre': maybe a crime was committed, maybe not, but that’s for the military justice system to decide.”

We’ll be watching.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: documentary; haditha; iraq; marines; murtha; pbs; whatreallyhappened; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Believing that PBS and Frontline will be fair to the Haditha Marines is definitely a case of hope trumping experience.

On the negative side, the promotional trailer on the Frontline website contained a bit by Josh White of the Washington Post that made me want to hurl.

On the other hand, one of the defense lawyers told me: "I wouldn’t judge the program by the trailer. I know the producers of the segment have been working assiduously to ensure the program appears fair and balanced, and the evidence of their dealings with us seems to support that premise. But fair and balanced means they include views from the other side, which obviously we don’t like."

Another said: "The producers have spent a lot of time conferring with me to attempt to get the facts correct, and to fairly present both sides. I had a choice - attempt to keep the piece fair, or refuse to participate and run the risk of a show that would surely be inaccurate because the producers don't know anything about military law. I chose to answer questions and keep the show as favorable as possible and still comply with the rules about discussing facts that are not in the public domain (here the Art 32 hearing). I anticipate they had to get the government's side from people like Josh White, because I doubt the prosecutors talked to them."

So there you have it. I'll put up a live thread on the 19th for people who are interested.

Speaking of live threads, there will be a segment on the Sgt Evan Vela case on Hanniity's America this Sunday, February 17. I plan to have a live thread for that as well (if you don't know about the case, search for keyword VELA.

1 posted on 02/16/2008 10:25:16 AM PST by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Watch the video at the LINK

2 posted on 02/16/2008 10:27:27 AM PST by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Thanks. DVR set to record.


3 posted on 02/16/2008 10:30:19 AM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
This is a powerful post by you, Red. We will have to hope that the Marines are given a fair shake in this documentary.

I know I'll certainly be watching.

4 posted on 02/16/2008 10:38:09 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Almost makes us po’ folks wanta spring for the dish network, ‘cause we’s too far out in the sticks to get PBS on antenna anymore. Semi-crazy National Guard Daughter is scheduled for her second tour of Iraq this fall, and we do wants to learn more about what really goes on “over there”.


5 posted on 02/16/2008 10:40:58 AM PST by flowerplough ( Obama smokes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4woodenboats; American Cabalist; AmericanYankee; AndrewWalden; Antoninus; AliVeritas; ardara; ...

6 posted on 02/16/2008 10:42:00 AM PST by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Thanks for this post, Red and for your continuing efforts to support these Marines. Looking forward to seeing it and hope it is fair.


7 posted on 02/16/2008 10:55:25 AM PST by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Thanks, Red! I’ll be looking for this!


8 posted on 02/16/2008 10:59:18 AM PST by USMCPOP (Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
>>>Almost makes us po’ folks wanta spring for the dish network<<<

Give it a try!

I've been on Direct TV for three or four years now. You won't be sorry. Worth it for the "Military Channel" alone -plus a bunch of other options not avail. on normal cable.

9 posted on 02/16/2008 11:05:20 AM PST by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
How can a child in pajamas be considered a threat?

This is a facile statement, IMO.

But in all fairness, I will have to see the program to see how it all fleshes out.

10 posted on 02/16/2008 11:05:32 AM PST by bigheadfred (THE SGT. EVAN VELA DEFENSE FUND , (See my FR homepage to help. Donate today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

BUMP


11 posted on 02/16/2008 11:09:34 AM PST by BunnySlippers (Buy a Mac ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred
How can a child in pajamas be considered a threat?

How can a few men with box cutters kill 3,000 people?

12 posted on 02/16/2008 11:14:52 AM PST by Steely Tom (Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

THANK YOU for alerting us to this broadcast. I will definitely be watching!

God bless our military and their families!


13 posted on 02/16/2008 11:14:55 AM PST by 4integrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Thanks for the heads-up. I’ve set my DVR to record it.


14 posted on 02/16/2008 11:25:31 AM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Bump. Let’s hope for that touted fairness...


15 posted on 02/16/2008 11:29:00 AM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
“Initially, we wanted to do a film about civilian casualties in Iraq,” Rath said

That line from Rath makes me worry.

I expect a story that is "balanced" propaganda, and not a story that is balanced.

16 posted on 02/16/2008 11:29:45 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

How can a child in pajamas be considered a threat?

How can a person with Down’s Syndrome be a threat you traitorous piece of terrorist-loving America hating journalistic-dog-doo.

That’s obviously meant for the reporter, not you, bigheadfred.


17 posted on 02/16/2008 11:37:38 AM PST by Keith (ANY REPUBLICAN in 2008 -- it's about defeating Mrs. Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Keith
How can a child in pajamas be considered a threat?

Must have been born after Viet Nam.
18 posted on 02/16/2008 11:43:18 AM PST by Beckwith (Dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xzins

It’s true that McGirk and Rath both started at the same place: a story about civilian casualities. But they went in very different directions after that. I’m sure the film will have things I disagree with, but I truly don’t believe Rath is a McGirk. Come on the live thread on the 19th and we’ll find out together.


19 posted on 02/16/2008 11:50:44 AM PST by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

I hate a lot of what I see on PBS, but I have been ok with and even enjoyed some of the Frontline pieces. The people in charge of Frontline seem to actually be rational, fairly balanced journalists.


20 posted on 02/16/2008 11:52:51 AM PST by ghost of nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson