[alecqss]

Go to the article and read the comments; some of them are unintentionally hysterical!

Indeed they are! Mr. Lucas treated with contempt because:
1. He's a Jew (I don't know whether it is true or not, but it's what they say);
2. Sympathizes with Israel (again, see above);
3. Gay

Most hilarious is this - according to some comments Mr. Lucas does not see the difference (supposedly) between Islam as religion (which is good and represents 1B people) and its followers, who are - ta-da - looks like all bad: autocratic, tyrannical, tribal, culturally backward, etc. These loons are chastising Mr. Lucas while making his exact point!

[Moose4]

I kid you not. When I went to the Stanford Daily page to read this article and the comments, what was the first ad I saw? “SingleMuslim.com, USA’s leading Muslim marriage service.”

The jokes, they just write themselves.

}:-)4

[buffaloKiller]

“2. Sympathizes with Israel (again, see above);
3. Gay “
No, he is “3. Queer” as in a social deviant and deserves to be perjorified. And a queer pornoPusher at that. Porno is NOT a 1st Amendment right and needs to be banned as much as RoeVWade and for much the same reasons. It undermines the integrety and decentcy and solidity of a heteroGodly famly-based society.

Just because the Muslims attack Queers does negate the correctness of doing so. Queers are as much the enemy as are the Muslims. Recall that the Culture War is a 3-way fight and that the enemy of my enemy is still my enemy also.