Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pawlenty As (McCain's) Veep?
Captain's Quarters ^ | Feb. 17, 2008 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 02/17/2008 11:02:50 AM PST by jdm

For over a year, Tim Pawlenty has supported John McCain through thick and a whole lot of thin. The two-term Minnesota governor became one of John McCain's first major endorsers in January 2007, and even at the time speculation began that Pawlenty could make a good running mate for McCain. Jonathan Martin at Politico has heard louder rumblings of consideration among the GOP base for Pawlenty, who could make a good presidential candidate anytime in the next twenty years:

Even through the McCain campaign’s darkest days in 2007, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty remained a steadfast ally to the Arizona senator in his bid for the Republican presidential nomination.

As a result, with John McCain as the clear GOP frontrunner and insider talk turning to speculation about his possible running mate, party insiders are now buzzing about the 47-year-old, second-term governor’s vice-presidential prospects.

Vin Weber, a Minnesota congressman-turned-Washington-lobbyist who is one of Pawlenty’s biggest boosters, ticks off the list of appealing traits.

“First of all, his age is attractive,” Weber says, hinting at the nearly quarter-century difference between his fellow Minnesotan and the 71-year-old McCain. “Second, he’s from outside Washington. Third, he represents a battleground part of the country. And he has a nice balance of, on one hand being totally acceptable to conservative wing of the party, especially to social conservatives, but at the same time sharing a couple of key maverick strains of thought with McCain.”

McCain has emphasized several times over the last couple of weeks that he hasn't begun to think about a running mate. He told George Stephanopolous today on ABC's This Week that it would be presumptive to start that process without actually having clinched the nomination:

STEPHANOPOULOS: How about on the vice presidency?

MCCAIN: We're getting ahead of ourselves.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you feel a need -- not that far ahead -- do you feel a need to pick someone who conservatives say right off the bat, "He or she is one of us"?

MCCAIN: Well, I hope that I could nominate someone that all of our party -- I mean, we have a lot of our party that all of our party would feel comfortable with. And that's a process that, again, you've seen before, where we begin a process of looking at the various people.

But, again, I am a little bit superstitious in that I really want to make sure that we have the nomination before I started that process.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So you've done nothing on that?

MCCAIN: No, nothing.

Given what McCain had to do to raise his candidacy from "mostly dead" status, it's entirely believable that he hasn't focused at all on his running mate. However, he will soon need to start. Especially with the enthusiasm and credibility gap that McCain has with the base, he needs someone who can reassure Republicans that he will govern conservatively and also provide the GOP with a credible national candidate for 2012 or 2016.

Pawlenty has some advantages for McCain. Geographically, he could help put Minnesota and Wisconsin in play, and perhaps firm up Iowa as well. If the GOP takes both Minnesota and Wisconsin from the Democrats, McCain could make up for a Pennsylvania or a couple of smaller states that could shift to the Democrats, especially if Obama runs. It could strengthen the GOP lock in the Midwest as well.

Politically, Pawlenty comes across as a homey, nice-guy politician -- but he has real talent for infighting. Pawlenty handled the bridge collapse without a hint of panic, a contrast to the Chicken Little hysterics who immediately blamed a lack of maintenance and opposition to tax increases for the tragedy. The eventual cause -- a design defect amplified by actual maintenance on the bridge -- vindicated Pawlenty, as did polling which showed a clear majority of Minnesotans opposed to increased taxes. He has managed a state legislature dominated by his opponents expertly, showing his toughness under fire a number of times.

Pawlenty may not pass muster at a CPAC as a clear-cut conservative. Pawlenty shares McCain's enthusiasm for global-warming initiatives, although both prefer free-market solutions to government-imposed energy management. His political situation in Minnesota has forced him into a few compromises on spending and taxes, including a renege on a no-tax pledge and an increase in cigarette "fees" that angered the tax hawks here in Minnesota.

Overall, however, Pawlenty could be what the GOP needs -- a young two-term governor with no peccadilloes and a strong record of at least center-right governance, if not outright conservative achievements. He and Mark Sanford of South Carolina would probably be the two best candidates for running mates on the GOP bench. Even if a McCain/Pawlenty ticket didn't manage to win in 2008, Pawlenty would be well-positioned afterward for a run at Amy Klobuchar's Senate seat in 2012, or perhaps a shot at the top of the ticket in that year or in 2016.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; mccain; mn2008; pawlenty; vp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 02/17/2008 11:02:51 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jdm

Minnesota has about as much chance of going Republican in the fall, with or without it’s governor on the ticket, as does Massachusetts.

McCain will carry no more than ten states. That’s what happens when the GOP becomes a me-too party.


2 posted on 02/17/2008 11:05:42 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
It might tip MN into McCain’s camp but would not do much else for him. T-Paw is pretty moderate. McCain would be better off with a solidly Conservative southerner.
3 posted on 02/17/2008 11:06:26 AM PST by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Is Pawlenty a RINO?


4 posted on 02/17/2008 11:07:13 AM PST by Sybeck1 (It's truly bad when your Savior in November is Judas Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Because he’s going to deliver MN? Stupid.


5 posted on 02/17/2008 11:07:17 AM PST by WriteOn (Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Pawlenty won’t do anything for the Religious-Right....he’s an R that got elected in Minnesota for cryin’ out loud....kind of like an upper Midwest version of Mit.


6 posted on 02/17/2008 11:07:32 AM PST by Keith in Iowa ( <<<Ann Coulter for McAmnesty's VP!!!>>>!!! <<<Life's a bitch, don't elect one President.>>>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

It could be worse.


7 posted on 02/17/2008 11:08:32 AM PST by Tribune7 (How is inflicting pain and death on an innocent, helpless human being for profit, moral?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
Pawlenty on Illegal immigration:

"Beyond that we've this issue of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants who are currently in the country. I don't know of many even hardcore conservatives, there are few, but not many in congress who are advocating for rounding up 12 million people and throwing them out of the country".

-- most of the conservatives are actually saying, they are only really arguing about what is the degree or lever of penalty so that it's not amnesty and -- so I don't think that's out of step with -- that general line of debate, it's not out of step with where most republicans are. There you -- you see you are hard pressed to find many who are saying lets throw 12 million, lets mount a military offensive, identify 12 million people and round them up and throw them out of the country, it's not where even most of the republican members of congress are at. They are just talking about -- like I said the severity of the penalty for having come here illegally and Senator McCain agrees with that approach and we are just -- now we are working out the details.

8 posted on 02/17/2008 11:11:10 AM PST by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.. (A "Concerned Citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie; MplsSteve

I met talked to T-Paw several times. Last time was at the Mn State Fair. He is not for raising taxes at all - but he does cave in to the Rats.

He supports Global Warming initiatives & leads the Governors on it.

He’s ok, but that’s about it......


9 posted on 02/17/2008 11:12:26 AM PST by LiveFreeOrDie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Most people are going to say first, Pawlenty who?

McCain needs to get an adult conservative who most
folks have heard of and knows their background in
most part.

Also who has national security background
as McCain is pushing 72


10 posted on 02/17/2008 11:13:33 AM PST by SoCalPol (Don't Blame Me - I Supported Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARE SOLE

So another amnesty rat-—just great. Immigration is the reason McCain will lose this thing.


11 posted on 02/17/2008 11:15:41 AM PST by Sybeck1 (It's truly bad when your Savior in November is Judas Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDie2001

Oh yeah, nice enough guy, and good on the stump, just not really going to add much to a national ticket. Certainly not with someone like McCain. Now as a running mate with a Duncan Hunter or a Fred Thompson, he might make sense.


12 posted on 02/17/2008 11:16:40 AM PST by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Will McCain choose a VP to please the Republican Party, or will he stick to his principles, and choose Lieberman or Hillary? Who knows? If he goes with Hillary, and the Democrats are fractured by the Hillary/Obama fight, McCain may get enough crossover Democrats to win. He should definitely hold out until he has a chance to ask Hillary. Lieberman is a weak second choice, but with McCain energized to save the world from global warming, Lieberman may be his best choice, with his lack of hot air. A surprise outside possibility is Gore. A McCain-Gore ticket might have what it takes for Republicans to beat the Democrat’s pop messiah. The MSM would love it, a PC, bipartisan dream come true.


13 posted on 02/17/2008 11:18:35 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Rick Santorum


14 posted on 02/17/2008 11:19:12 AM PST by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Pawlenty a moderate? Sorry, I WILL stay home if the liberal Tim Pawlenty is on the ticket as VP. His baseball stadium scheme, ethanol mandates, global warming garbage, and other progressive “ideas” make him revolting. He has gone 180 degrees in one year.

At our (large) caucus one person wanted to bring forward a resolution requesting Tim Pawlenty announce himself as a liberal. It would have passed almost unanimously except the precinct leader wouldn’t let us vot in it.


15 posted on 02/17/2008 11:24:53 AM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jdm
a strong record of at least center-right governance, if not outright conservative achievements

Well, I'm excited. /sarc

16 posted on 02/17/2008 11:25:09 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

He doesn’t bring enough to the table for this conservative to consider McCain. Little name recognition. Small state with no guarantee he’ll help the GOP carry it in November.

Nope, doesn’t go far enough for me.


17 posted on 02/17/2008 11:25:29 AM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Life is too short to go through it clenched of sphincter and void of humor - it's okay to laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Mark Sanford would be my recommendation. He would help pull together the South.


18 posted on 02/17/2008 11:31:14 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

You were saying about McCain’s veep.....


19 posted on 02/17/2008 11:31:28 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pallis

Lieberman — possibly...
Hillary? Definitely not....it would ruin her chances of ever becoming President — neither the R’s nor the D’s would trust her.
Gore? I don’t see him running for office any time soon, but again the lefties wouldn’t trust him if he came out with another global warming movie or book.


20 posted on 02/17/2008 11:31:38 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson