Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: umgud
He shouldn’t have brandished the gun. The perps could have taken it from him and killed everybody!

Actually, let's think about that for a moment.

The fellow pulled his weapon and held the folks at gunpoint. A good result, because the punks held still. I'm glad he was armed, and that he interevened, and I'm glad he held the nice people for the cops.

Here's the question: how far was the fellow prepared to go, if one or more of the punks refused to cooperate? Would he have been justified in shooting if the punks began to run?

When I think about concealed carry, I think about that sort of thing. Are folks trained and prepared to think through the "what next" aspects of actually drawing their weapons?

I'm all for normal folks being armed. I really hope folks will take the responsibility to get that sort of training. But I suspect that most do not, and that's too bad.

22 posted on 02/18/2008 11:28:36 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
Very good questions to ask. The minute you move from concealed to not concealed you open up a can of worms especially in a situation like being described.
If someone had a gun or someone fired a gun you at least answer the question of equal force.
At least the cops didn’t create an issue.
27 posted on 02/18/2008 3:21:05 PM PST by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson