Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-life groups choose McCain (Wisconsin Right To Life Leader)
Washington Times ^ | 2/18/08

Posted on 02/18/2008 6:26:34 AM PST by Mr. Brightside

"He is pro-life in his heart of hearts, in my opinion," said Rep. Christopher H. Smith, New Jersey Republican and a pro-life movement leader, who said Mr. McCain's commitment stretches back across decades of votes in the House and Senate.

"When you contrast him with the alternative and you think about such things as Supreme Court appointments, McCain is a far better choice," said Barbara L. Lyons, executive director of Wisconsin Right to Life, an organization that took Mr. McCain all the way to the Supreme Court over his campaign-finance laws, and won.

"From my perspective, I see him as someone we can enthusiastically support, and I look forward to his getting elected," Mr. Jakubczyk (president of Arizona Right to Life) said, adding they have endorsed Mr. McCain every time he has run in Arizona.

"I have been on the campaign trail, I have been at meetings with him, I have been at organization and party gatherings, the issue with him is very clear that he's pro-life," (Jan Brewer, Arizona Secretary of State) said.

For Matt Salmon, a strong pro-life advocate and former congressman from Arizona, there's no doubt where Mr. McCain comes down.

"I have been with John McCain through thick and thin. This is a man I truly believe in, and I could not be as supportive as I am if I thought there was any ounce of equivocation," he said.

Mr. Salmon said that was solidified during his 1994 campaign for Congress when he was the only pro-life candidate in a crowded field of Republicans. "He endorsed me in that primary, and he told me the reason he did was because of my pro-life stance," Mr. Salmon said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: mccain; nrlc; prolifevote; wi2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 02/18/2008 6:26:35 AM PST by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

Amen.


2 posted on 02/18/2008 6:28:41 AM PST by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

So do Pro Amnesty and Pro close Gitmo and give them lawyers groups.


3 posted on 02/18/2008 6:31:13 AM PST by Slump Tester (-What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

Heart of hearts, supreme court appointments, I think I’m going to be sick. Is this what we have to look forward to in the months ahead?


4 posted on 02/18/2008 6:31:40 AM PST by claudiustg (We're Whiggin' out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

Steven and Ginsberg may retire this term.

I am not expecting a Clarence Thomas appointmet from McCain.

If the best we get are a couple of young Sandra Day O’Connors, that is a LOT better than getting two young liberals.


5 posted on 02/18/2008 6:35:02 AM PST by Mr. Brightside ( Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970504/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
BTW - If he's so pro life, why did he PERSONALLY file a brief to keep a right to life group from showing the anti abortion stuff before an election?

I don't remember the exact particulars, but your Mr. Wonderful was kissing Ted Kennedy's or some other deocRAT's ass and did that.

6 posted on 02/18/2008 6:37:26 AM PST by Slump Tester (-What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

Doesn’t matter. McQueeg can’t win and can switch parties after the election.


7 posted on 02/18/2008 6:39:25 AM PST by cripplecreek (Just call me M.O.M. (Maverick Opposed to McCain.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

I do not agree with McCain on that, but for your information the original CFR law was to keep ALL “special interest groups” from doing that before an election.

It did not single out Right to Lifers.


8 posted on 02/18/2008 6:44:27 AM PST by Mr. Brightside ( Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970504/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

WRTL? John really did some work.

BTW, Bill went off on some pro-lifers. Tell me if you smell set-up by their campaign or O’s.

http://lucianne.com/threads2.asp?artnum=386372

Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XfmJeIJpns


9 posted on 02/18/2008 6:45:12 AM PST by AliVeritas ( (To err is human, but to really screw up it takes the Berkeley City Council))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

John McCain 2008 President who is on the side of the Unborn!


10 posted on 02/18/2008 6:46:12 AM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
Is this what we have to look forward to in the months ahead?

Yes, people sacrificing their principles to try to prop up a candidate not worthy of the sacrifice.

11 posted on 02/18/2008 6:49:08 AM PST by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Yeah, Rep. Cris Smith has no principles.

/sarc


12 posted on 02/18/2008 6:50:55 AM PST by Mr. Brightside ( Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970504/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
"He is pro-life in his heart of hearts, in my opinion," said Rep. Christopher H. Smith, New Jersey Republican and a pro-life movement leader,

McCain quoted during an interview with The San Francisco Chronicle in 1999.

" I’d love to see a point where it is irrelevant, and could be repealed because abortion is no longer necessary. But certainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations."
13 posted on 02/18/2008 7:24:43 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

>>>If he’s so pro life, why did he PERSONALLY file a brief to keep a right to life group from showing the anti abortion stuff before an election?<<<

_____________________________________________________

“Senator McCain was not a party to the dispute between Wisconsin Right to Life and the Federal Election Commission. .... Kathryn’s law professor correspondent very helpfully pronounces that “Whether one approves of the campaign finance law or not, it affects pro-life and pro-choice groups in precisely the same way.”

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTQ0NDJjN2ZmNmYzZGFiNDIwOGFlYWMyODcxZjQxNTk=


14 posted on 02/18/2008 7:27:39 AM PST by Mr. Brightside ( Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970504/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

And who is YOUR pro-life candidate?


15 posted on 02/18/2008 7:30:17 AM PST by Mr. Brightside ( Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970504/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

NARAL gives McCain a voting record of ZERO to FOUR percent.

Right to Life gives him over 70 percent.

Where would we be if ALL of Congress voted as pro-life as John McCain?


16 posted on 02/18/2008 7:32:23 AM PST by Mr. Brightside ( Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970504/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
And who is YOUR pro-life candidate?

Duncan Hunter. He will be my write in candidate.
17 posted on 02/18/2008 7:37:50 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
NARAL gives McCain a voting record of ZERO to FOUR percent.

Having to choose between what McCain has actually said and done and some groups who makes up some arbitrary subjective rating, I'll take the later every time.
18 posted on 02/18/2008 7:40:40 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Great , you write-in Hunter...and we’ll get Obama...I wonder what his NARAL rating is?

The unborn are not pleased by your decision.


19 posted on 02/18/2008 7:43:38 AM PST by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Having to choose between what McCain has actually said and done

What McCain HAS DONE for the pro-life movement has been to be a strong and solid pro-life vote for 30 years. (embryonic stem cell and CFR exceptions noted).

I wish all in Congress had a pro-life voting record as strong as McCain, don't you?

20 posted on 02/18/2008 7:43:58 AM PST by Mr. Brightside ( Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970504/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson