Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Larry Sinclair $100,000 Polygraph challenge has been scheduled for next Tuesday in NYC
http://www.whitehouse.com/NewsComments.aspx?start=&NewsID=110 ^

Posted on 02/19/2008 11:46:19 AM PST by HD1200

We're not ready to share all the details about our upcoming evening lie-detecting with Obama accuser Larry Sinclair, but there are a few things that we want to tell you – namely that we've agreed on a time and place to carry out our wager with Mr. Sinclair.

We're going to meet him on Tuesday, February 26th at a undisclosed location in New York City. We've picked a polygraph expert, too: a renowned expert who has been involved in quite a few high-profile cases who we're not going to name until the results are not only in, but have been verified by a second renowned expert..

Then, we'll post the results, the names of both polygraph experts, and other relevant information, along with video and pictures, here on Whitehouse.com. Since the outcome of the test will be vital interest to the voting public, our findings will be made available before the presidential primaries in Texas and Ohio slated for March 4. That's all for now, but check back for updates


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: damnlies; larrysinclair; lies; obama; obamagay; pornking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-177 next last
To: TCats
Actually, there are no drugs that will cause one to react more strongly to the control questions than to the relevant ones (which is the key to passing). But yes, polygraph countermeasures are simple, easily learned, and no polygrapher has demonstrated any ability to detect them.

AntiPolygraph.org

61 posted on 02/19/2008 12:43:48 PM PST by George Maschke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Sorry charlie. Obama is a know liar. Why would you believe him?


62 posted on 02/19/2008 12:45:00 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I wonder if this story would be so hidden if it was about a Republican. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I think not.


63 posted on 02/19/2008 12:53:58 PM PST by JaneNC (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: George Maschke

Doesn’t matter. We are talking about the general population hearing he passed a lie detector test - if he does and the impact that has with some of them.

I hear you about lie detector tests being very unreliable; probably why they are not admissable as evidence anymore, eh?


64 posted on 02/19/2008 12:54:30 PM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JaneNC

Nope. He’d be on Oprah, GMA and the ABC evening news by now.


65 posted on 02/19/2008 12:55:18 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: JaneNC

I’m thinking there might be the equivalent of a blue dress in this story yet to come.


66 posted on 02/19/2008 12:56:01 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TCats

I once read where you tape a thumb tack to the inside of your big toe and when answering the questions, you squeeze your toes together pushing the point into the neiboring toe and causing a good bit of pain that messes with measuring the veracity of your answers.


67 posted on 02/19/2008 12:56:32 PM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

His claimed demographic is not known for mental health.


68 posted on 02/19/2008 12:56:36 PM PST by Dead Dog (Classic Liberalism..AT ALL COSTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: George Maschke

Who cares? As in the words of the left wing media when on a Republican witch hunt: it is the SERIOUSNESS of the ACCUSATION that warrants an investigation....


69 posted on 02/19/2008 12:57:37 PM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Sorry charlie. Obama is a know liar. Why would you believe him?

Bill Clinton is a known liar too. If some guy came forward and said he'd seen Clinton shoot Kennedy, abduct Jimmy Hoffa and crucify Jesus, would you believe those allegations too? This story is just ridiculous. If Obama is a gay crack whore, I'm the Easter Bunny.

70 posted on 02/19/2008 12:59:33 PM PST by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

Mr. Sinclair’s extraordinary allegations demand extraordinary evidence to back them up. Thus far, he has offered no evidence whatsoever to back up his claims. The polygraph will offer no evidence one way or the other.


71 posted on 02/19/2008 1:01:45 PM PST by George Maschke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

There is the crux of the problem. You don’t believe Obama capable of such tawdriness. Well, I pegged him for a poofer the first time I saw him.


72 posted on 02/19/2008 1:03:01 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: George Maschke

“Mr. Sinclair’s extraordinary allegations demand extraordinary evidence to back them up.”

The allegations are ordinary not extraordinary, unless of course you consider Obamam the new Messiah..


73 posted on 02/19/2008 1:04:38 PM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: George Maschke

To the best of my knowledge, Mr. Sinclair has presented no documentation whatsoever of his claims regarding Mr. Obama.

In the interview, he says he has contacted Citigroup to get copies of his statements for the period in question. According to Sinclair, Citigroup maintains records for that long.


74 posted on 02/19/2008 1:05:01 PM PST by Pinetop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: George Maschke

Pretty run of the mill allegations for a politician these days.


75 posted on 02/19/2008 1:05:21 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
Wow! I hammered away with a few thoughts, then..... sorry the thread has been pulled. Paranoid I was, thinking other thoughts. Maybe I can cut down my former lengthy screed.

Not wishing to comment on Barack Obama, it gave me a bit of the deja vu. I think the mind of the homosexual deserves some understanding. The idea of normalcy and what goes on behind closed doors their business, is freely stated. I find there is a destructive element here. Americans may be perturbed at the possible success of Senator Obama but.....

A British political leader was Jeremy Thorpe, a rare bird- a charismatic Liberal. His party was nearly extinct. He charged in and the Liberal won bye-election after bye election. The popular vote tripled. Suddenly a man came forward about his affairs with Thorpe. Nobody wanted to run with it. He got into petty troubles to appear in court. Then used the court as a forum to accuse Thorpe.

The following events, including the man being threatened, ruined Thorpe and his revival of the Liberals. The question in my mind and it just occurred to me that in New Jersey an Israeli citizen accused a political figure. This to that man's internal agony.

Why does the homosexual seek to destroy? It beats me.

76 posted on 02/19/2008 1:05:52 PM PST by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
You don’t believe Obama capable of such tawdriness. Well, I pegged him for a poofer the first time I saw him.

Sure looks the part

But now the democrats have a black homosexual and a woman lesbian running

NOW I am really proud of my country (sarcasm)
77 posted on 02/19/2008 1:07:22 PM PST by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

LOL. Well, we had a serial philanderer and rapist. This might be a step up.


78 posted on 02/19/2008 1:08:26 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I agree that there is a good probability the guy is telling the truth. But the real problem here is that if it is proven true, it won’t destroy his candidacy. The left is supported by exactly those kind of people. They will be proud of Obama because he “scored” some sex. He will pick up more votes from places like San Francisco...........


79 posted on 02/19/2008 1:10:36 PM PST by Quickgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

I disagree with you about Mr. Sinclair’s accusations being “ordinary.” Mr. Obama is an astute politician who even in 1999 had aspirations for higher political office. It seems unlikely that he would have engaged in such reckless behavior. Mr. Sinclair has offered no evidence to support his sensational claims; instead, in his YouTube appearance, he challenges Mr. Obama to a polygraph showdown. Which doesn’t bolster his credibility, in my book.


80 posted on 02/19/2008 1:10:37 PM PST by George Maschke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson