Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islamic fundamentalists lose big in Pakistan vote
McClatchy Newspapers ^ | 02/19/08 | Saeed Shah

Posted on 02/20/2008 12:34:55 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

Islamic fundamentalists lose big in Pakistan vote

By Saeed Shah, McClatchy Newspapers Tue Feb 19, 4:38 PM ET

LAHORE, Pakistan — Pakistani voters handed Islamist political parties a massive defeat Monday, virtually eliminating them from regional parliaments in an election that's likely to have a wide-ranging impact on efforts to rein in growing Taliban and al Qaida influence in Pakistan's North West Frontier province.

In 2002, fundamentalist religious parties, some openly sympathetic to the Taliban, won 12 percent of the national vote. That was enough to form a regional government in the North West Frontier province, which borders Afghanistan , become part of the ruling coalition in Baluchistan, another conservative province, and hold 57 seats in the 342-member national parliament.

But unofficial results of Monday's vote indicate that religious parties won only five seats in the national parliament this time. In North West Frontier province, where the country's Islamic insurgency is strongest, religious parties won just nine seats in the 96-seat provincial assembly. In 2002, they won 67.

"This is a sea-change," said Khalid Aziz , a political analyst based in the province's capital, Peshawar . "The people have rejected the much-hyped Islamic nation concept."

The North West Frontier province's voters turned instead to two secular parties, the Pakistan Peoples Party , which emerged as the biggest force across the country, and the Awami National Party , which gained the most provincial seats, bringing it back from decades of marginalization.

Critics of the religious parties had charged that they pandered to Islamic extremists, or at least turned a blind eye to their activities. As a result, a group of heavily armed militants seized control of the province's Swat valley late last year.

"They were not committed to fighting the terrorists," Aziz said. "They were the flip side of the same coin."

Mahmood Shah , a former senior government official in the North West Frontier province who's now a security consultant, said that voters hoped the secular parties would be more willing to go after militant groups that travel routinely between Pakistan and Afghanistan .

"For the last five years, the provincial government has been trying to defuse federal government activity" against militants, Shah said. The secular parties "have a clear stance on terrorism," he said.

Shah said he expected that local officials also would become more willing to cooperate with Afghanistan in suppressing Islamic militants, noting that the Awami National Party has good relations with U.S.-backed Afghan President Hamid Karzai . Karzai and U.S. officials think that the Taliban and al Qaida use Pakistan's tribal belt as a base.

The religious parties also faced an electorate that was unhappy with their tough positions on moral issues. The religious coalition had banned billboards showing women and prohibited theatrical performances.

In the Punjabi city of Jhang in Pakistan's heartland, a religious cleric who's accused of heading a banned violent Islamic group, the Sipah-e-Sahaba, also lost. Mohammad Ahmad Ludhianvi got more than 35,000 votes but was defeated by a margin of about 5,000 by Sheik Waqas, a member of the Pakistan Muslim League-Q , the political party that backs the election's biggest loser, U.S.-backed Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf .

(Shah is a McClatchy special correspondent.)


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: defeat; election; fundamentalist; pakistan

1 posted on 02/20/2008 12:34:56 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

in other news Barak Hussein Obama wins big in American primaries...


2 posted on 02/20/2008 12:39:09 AM PST by ari-freedom (don't tell anyone I wrote that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Secularism is where it’s at in Pakistan? Who would’ve known.


3 posted on 02/20/2008 1:32:30 AM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
was defeated by a margin of about 5,000 by Sheik Waqas, a member of the Pakistan Muslim League-Q , the political party that backs the election's biggest loser, U.S.-backed Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf.

Hey McClatchy, if we really backed him, why did we push for this election?

4 posted on 02/20/2008 3:04:54 AM PST by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

This is EXCELLENT news!


5 posted on 02/20/2008 3:35:07 AM PST by Humble Servant ( Keep it simple - do what's right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

At last, some good news.


6 posted on 02/20/2008 4:01:43 AM PST by tennteacher (Hunter Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Oh well, guess it’s back to the bombs for them.


7 posted on 02/20/2008 4:42:52 AM PST by txroadhawg ("To compare Congress to drunken sailors is an insult to drunken sailors." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txroadhawg
"Oh well, guess it’s back to the bombs for the"

exactly!

Just wait and watch, there will be a new string of terror bombings coming soon to neighborhoods all over Pakistan.
8 posted on 02/20/2008 4:45:02 AM PST by The Louiswu (Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Pakistani voters handed Islamist political parties a massive defeat Monday, virtually eliminating them from regional parliaments in an election that's likely to have a wide-ranging impact on efforts to rein in growing Taliban and al Qaida influence in Pakistan's North West Frontier province.

Excellent! I guess Pakistanis, like Iraqis, are getting sick of al-Queda's carp, too!

9 posted on 02/20/2008 7:34:23 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000; maine-iac7; lancer; voletti; GOPJ; Tigen; AliVeritas; Grimmy; gonzo; ...
Pakistan ۋﮧ۱م

FReepmail if you want on or off
10 posted on 02/20/2008 5:54:21 PM PST by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson