Posted on 02/23/2008 4:35:46 AM PST by Kaslin
The presidential race is sure looking like it will be Democratic Sen. Barack Obama versus Republican Sen. John McCain. Team Obama is no doubt overjoyed, having already run with the "yesterday versus the future" rhetoric that is typical for a fight between a charismatic 46-year-old and a 71-year-old Vietnam War veteran. But Team McCain, despite its outreach problems even among the GOP's base, needn't despair. Obama, a senator in only his third year, can be beaten. If only McCain would try.
Just days after Chris Matthews reported experiencing a thrill up his leg when Obama spoke, the "Hardball" host lambasted a Texas legislator who braved the MSNBC talking-heads show to do his part in support of Obama's campaign.
Matthews was merciless: "What has he accomplished, sir? You say you support him. Sir, you have to give me his accomplishments. You've supported him for president. You are on national television. Name his legislative accomplishments. Barack Obama. Sir."
The poor local pol's answer was instructive (and accurate): "Well, I'm not going to be able to name you specific items of legislative accomplishments."
Matthews pressed on: "Can you name any? Can you name anything he's accomplished as a congressman?"
The local pol: "No, I'm not going to be able to do that tonight."
Matthews: "Well, that is a problem isn't it?"
It sure is. McCain has both an authority that comes with real experience in Washington and a good-old-boy likeability to anyone who's not working with him (he's known for outbursts in the Senate), plus he doesn't have the high negatives his colleague Sen. Hillary Clinton suffers from, perhaps fatally. McCain can adopt the "ready from day one" meme the former first lady has unconvincingly and patronizingly used with Democratic primary voters. He can do it with a legitimacy Clinton never has had.
He needs to make the fullest possible use of this obvious advantage. He needs to embrace the fact that he doesn't have a naive belief that he can wave a magic wand and remove our troops from Iraq the day he is inaugurated. He's a responsible leader, so he knows that left-wing promises to "end the war in Iraq" are euphemisms for losing the war in Iraq. However, he who campaigned for his early primaries on a "No Surrender Tour" needs to go beyond what has been his saving grace with conservative voters -- the fact that he was the leading advocate of the "surge" policy that Gen. David Petraeus has successfully executed in Iraq, at a time when that position was very unpopular in Washington. As Congress went into the Presidents' Day recess, McCain missed a great opportunity to show he's willing to be a leader. When Congress faced a deadline to continue a post-9/11 reform that allows intelligence officials to monitor foreign terrorists overseas, Congress went on vacation without getting a bill to the president's desk. As the House defiantly and recklessly refused to act, McCain could have taken the opportunity to show leadership on the domestic front of this war against us, using the deadline as a clarifying moment in both the election and the war.
But he didn't.
After winning the Wisconsin primary the following week, McCain took aim at Obama. He declared: "I will fight every moment of every day in this campaign to make sure Americans are not deceived by an eloquent but empty call for change ... that promises no more than a holiday from history and a return to the false promises and failed policies of a tired philosophy that trusts in government more than the people. Our purpose is to keep this blessed country free, safe, prosperous and proud. And the changes we offer to the institutions and policies of government will reflect and rely upon the strength, industry, aspirations and decency of the people we serve."
For all his faults, Rudy Giuliani -- when it came to terrorist surveillance -- was clear and unrelenting. He talked like the prosecutor he once was, tracking down and convicting mobsters. Maybe McCain needs a talking to the next time Rudy does a campaign appearance for him. If McCain means what he says, he needs to fight the whole war. He can convince the nation he belongs in the White House, but he's going have to lead on security, both foreign and domestic, to do it.
See that answer Anyone But McCain shows to me that people would rather throw away an election for President to the other party than accept there are variations within the Republican Party.
You cannot accept that one large group of people are going to agree on all concepts - however for one to cross party lines at this point and hope the other side will win the presidency is a shocker to me.
Might even be best for the Republic Party if they left.
Great should be a hot seller come November. I will stock up
now.
LOL :>)
Don't you actually mean that the GOP has become like one of those pod people in The Invasion of The Body Snatchers? They look like the real McCoy, but scratch just beneath the surface and you'll find an obvious counterfeit.
Ok, sorry, did’nt have a clue about it.
McCain’s “winning strategy” was McCain-Feingold - AND - unfortuantely - worked only too well.
I do not take kindly to lectures from K-Lo as she is known at NRO online or whatever Hugh Hewitt refers to as on his radio show.
It's easy to list the good things that we got from GW Bush. Tax cuts, judges, a well fought WOT...and there have been numerous lists on this board that show other good things.
Don't vote for McCain if that is what you wants, but please spare me the rationalizations.
You are right. What you will get is a globalist/socialist ready to inherit the Baker "moderate" agenda. Amnesty, LOST treaty, NAU/SPP, and etc... McCain would pick up where Bush leaves off.
Thank God the Conservatives won't let him cross the threshold of the White House.
The Christian Right, even by themselves, will be enough to crater McCain's campaign wishes and White House dreams, not to mention the rest of the Conservative base- Most of whom will not be voting for him.
08 losses will be larger than 06 by an order of magnitude. The Republicans can thank the moderates for that, for they vainly thought to hold on to power when they should have ceded it to the Conservatives after the amnesty mess.
Image and likeability elects more Presidents than debating skills, like President Lincoln?
No candidate has ever won with the “youth” vote. Theymake up a small percentage of the voters, even if they’ve increased the numbers they are turning out. I think when the two of them debate...it will be noticeable to the adults, who seems more presidential.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.