Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clintons' Tax Returns Would Cast a Wider Light
Wall Street Journal ^ | February 23, 2008 | JOHN R. EMSHWILLER and JAMES BANDLER

Posted on 02/23/2008 10:33:51 AM PST by kingattax

Hillary Clinton has resisted calls from Barack Obama to follow him in releasing personal tax returns, arguing that Senate and presidential disclosure rules already have required her to make public large amounts of personal financial information.

But the New York senator's tax returns likely would provide information not available in those filings. The returns probably would show at least some of the hundreds of thousands of dollars of income earned in recent years by Bill Clinton that isn't required to be reported on Mrs. Clinton's political disclosure forms. The 1040 form also would show how much taxes the Clintons pay annually and whether they are paying at the standard rate or have used various deductions and shelters to lower their Internal Revenue Service bill. • Campaign Issue: Hillary Clinton has resisted calls from Barack Obama to release personal tax returns. • What They Show: Her returns would reveal how much the Clintons pay annually in taxes, along with other financial details. • Her Pledge: A Clinton spokesman says she would release her tax information if she becomes the Democratic presidential nominee.

Howard Wolfson, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, said she has committed to releasing her tax information if she does become the Democratic Party's presidential nominee. Calling for release of the tax returns now "is an attempt to create an issue where there isn't one," he said. Mr. Wolfson also said the couple take "traditional" tax deductions but didn't elaborate.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/23/2008 10:33:52 AM PST by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: kingattax

Didn’t the Clinton’s take a donation deduction for used underpants in the past?
What a pair of criminal clowns.


3 posted on 02/23/2008 10:46:36 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

We’ll get copies of Clintoons tax returns when we see the proof of who hired Craig Livingstone.


4 posted on 02/23/2008 10:49:28 AM PST by RoadKingSE (How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

1988: two penniless grifters from Arkansas.

20 years pass with no real private sector job.

2008: combined net worth of $100 million to $200 million.


5 posted on 02/23/2008 10:50:49 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Winter Storm Watch

So are the dem voters supposed to just believe her tax statements are on the up and up? Wow, what faith they must have in a person that has such a rich history of lying, stealing and manipulating.


7 posted on 02/23/2008 11:42:18 AM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson