[alecqss]

I’m afraid, Prof. Kamerschen, you will have to give Obama A+ anyway. After all, Obama “explained that many rich people are happy to reverse the tax cuts as long as they know that the money is going to a good cause”.

[Illuminatas]

Who is John Galt?

[OCMike]

I think the good Professor has stated on his website that he did not write that artice. I’m not refuting the accuracy, just saying that the purported authorship is questionable.

http://davidk.myweb.uga.edu/

[ricks_place]

The first four men (the poorest) must share in the windfall.
They would each be paid $1 to drink while the others pay!
Democrats demand tax windfalls for those not paying taxes!

[rawhide]

I love this old analogy.

[Son House]

Democrat Math Just Doesn’t Add Up!

McDole needs to confront Clinton and Obama on their math if he ever wants to be President.

[rawhide]

Actually, the fairest thing to do would have been for each man to have paid $10 each for the beer, then after the owner reduced the price, each would now pay $8 each.

[Cacique]

btt

[johnny7]

And of course there comes a point... where the government and the “have nots” realize it is quicker and simpler to seize the assets of the “haves” and send them into slave labor rather than beat around the bush.

[Joan Kerrey]

LOL
Good analogy to pass along.