Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Larry Sinclair: Obama Accuser Fails Polygraphs
bloggernews ^

Posted on 02/24/2008 3:56:19 PM PST by hotdog777

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: mbraynard
So a candidate has to address every nutball accusation with not a shred of evidence behind it?

Unfortunately yes, assuming you realize your question was too exaggerated. The penalty for false accusations should be stiff. But the importance of knowing the truth cannot be overstated when you are talking about the person who will be the President of the United States for 4 years at least. That's a lot of power to hand someone without thoroughly investigating serious allegations.

21 posted on 02/24/2008 4:10:52 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
It’s not the nature of the evidence, it’s the seriousness of the charge....got it?
22 posted on 02/24/2008 4:11:43 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron ("I fear we have woken a sleeping giant and filled her with a terrible resolve" - Osama 9-11-01?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
What was he doing it for? Gee whiz, maybe because that's what he did. Just because a burned out doper homosexual fails a lie detector test, that doesn't mean he told a lie.

Over on the other end of Obama's speechwriter, campaign advisor Axelrod we find Deval Patrick, Governor of Massachusetts. He's Obama's good buddy you know, and sometimes he delivers Axelrod's speeches first, and sometimes second, but whatever, he and Obama deliver the same speeches.

Anyway Deval's got a top level staffer who was picked up at the end of December for homosexual rape on a 15 year old boy.

Sex at both ends ~ could be?

23 posted on 02/24/2008 4:12:22 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hotdog777
...the sum of $10,000 to take a polygraph plus another check for $100,000 if he passed

I wish someone would offer Huma the same deal

24 posted on 02/24/2008 4:12:53 PM PST by Popman (Gold Standard: Trying to squeeze a 50 lb economy back into a 5 lb bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
"So what was this guy’s motive?"

He was hired by Osama to make the false claims, be branded a liar. This non truth will be offered as proof Osama is not a doper.

All subsequent efforts to expose Osama's character will reference this polygraph as if Hussein has passed it.

Yet, Hussein Osama is an admitted doper.

yitbos

25 posted on 02/24/2008 4:13:21 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds. - Ayn Rand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

</S> oops


26 posted on 02/24/2008 4:13:23 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron ("I fear we have woken a sleeping giant and filled her with a terrible resolve" - Osama 9-11-01?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
Yes, the seriousness of the allegation calls for the greatest level of scrutiny.

This should include DNA tests of Senator Obama's underwear.

27 posted on 02/24/2008 4:14:09 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hotdog777

Obama is a damned socialist. That’s scandalous enough for me.


28 posted on 02/24/2008 4:14:16 PM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

It is news that it happened, whether true or false.


29 posted on 02/24/2008 4:15:37 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
He was hired by Osama to make the false claims, be branded a liar. This non truth will be offered as proof Osama is not a doper. All subsequent efforts to expose Osama's character will reference this polygraph as if Hussein has passed it. Yet, Hussein Osama is an admitted doper. yitbos

Could be, except I would think Obama's media darlings would have been more willing to report the story if that were the case. That theory assumes Obama wanted the story to get play time.

30 posted on 02/24/2008 4:19:44 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
The seriousness of the allegations trumps the questionability of Mr. Sinclair.

You must be tom dasshole's long lost brother. That is stooping lower than the demorats.

31 posted on 02/24/2008 4:23:18 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
This is brilliant—Obama has this creep make a rediculious claim and be found to be a lier. Now any with simular claims will not be believed! Even Slick Willie never did this. Give Obama points for brains. I bet there is a trunk full of dark things in Obama’s past.

I honestly always thought that this was a clinton hit job, but one poorly done.

Obama has dirt, Hillary has slung plenty of it at him, but he's been teflon to her.

32 posted on 02/24/2008 4:25:38 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hotdog777
I was skeptical of Sinclair from the onset. However, before the MSM and liberals will ever go after Obama only if there is a videotape of him having sex and them proving his DNA all over the clothes and sheets.
33 posted on 02/24/2008 4:26:04 PM PST by vetvetdoug (Just when one thinks life is strange, it gets stranger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotdog777

Whoops.


34 posted on 02/24/2008 4:26:18 PM PST by forkinsocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Polygraphs most certainly do work.

They are a stable of investigations and are considered by those who do this for a living as very reliable.

Whenever people don’t like the outcome of a polygraph they just, boom, state as if all the knowledge in the world were in their considerable brains....”Polygraphs don’t work.”

They’re not admissible in court and perhaps they shouldn’t be.

But they work quite reliably most of the time.

I base my assertion on the fact that the way vast majority of law enforcement organizations in this country use polygraphs as does the FBI.

On what basis is your assertion that....boom...they don’t work?


35 posted on 02/24/2008 4:28:34 PM PST by Fishtalk (If you liked the above post, remember I've got a Blog you might like to visit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hotdog777

More wasted Clinton campaign cash.


36 posted on 02/24/2008 4:28:50 PM PST by billhilly (I was republican when republican wasn't cool. (With an apology to Barbara Mandrell.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
He was hired by Osama to make the false claims, be branded a liar. This non truth will be offered as proof Osama is not a doper.

I heard more about this guy from Clinton supporters then anywhere else.

Obama basically ignored this guy, I always thought he was a clinton plant, but no one really cared.

If he had been paid by the Obama campaign, they would have acknowledged him by both claiming he is lying and working for a rival campaign, and then they would have been trumping this lie detector as de facto evidence that the guy is a liar.

Instead they acted like didn't exist.

37 posted on 02/24/2008 4:30:31 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hotdog777

No surprise. This was moonbat stuff from the go.


38 posted on 02/24/2008 4:35:50 PM PST by newzjunkey (Why McCain in Nov? Clintons hated and dismantled the military; Obama is even worse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
Instead they acted like didn't exist.

That seems like it was the wisest thing to do. Obama obviously knew it didn't happen and making unnecessary noise about it would be like dumping gasoline on hot cols that would burn themselves out otherwise.
39 posted on 02/24/2008 4:36:26 PM PST by cripplecreek (Voting CONSERVATIVE in memory of 5 children killed by illegals 2/17/08 and 2/19/ 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: hotdog777

Some Freeper posers are disappointed.


40 posted on 02/24/2008 4:39:14 PM PST by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson