[fightinJAG]

Both parties have people making “not good enough” arguments against the nominee, and both parties as a whole view such people the same way-—as spoilers and as responsible for the election of the other guy.

If people feel strongly justified in not voting for their party’s candidate, fine. But they should at least acknowledge that their act of (1) refusing to vote, or (2) voting for a protest candidate who has no chance of winning makes them responsible for the election of the other guy.

If people are unwilling to acknowledge that, then at least acknowledge that the rest of the party views their act that way.

[KarlInOhio]

Save that for a McCain topic. In this case a vote for Nader instead of the Obama-Clinton alliance is the highest act of patriotism (snicker. Do you think the DUmmies are buying it?)

PS - Nader, thanks for taking 97,421 Florida moonbat votes from Gore in 2000.