Replies

                     *** Who's To Blame ***

When and if something terrible happens, are you going to wake up and
say George Bush caused all of this?  Is that the liberal response if
God forbid something horrible happens in this country, something worse
than 9/11, you're going to blame the Republicans, Bush, heterosexuals,
white people, Christianity, Jews?

Who are you going to blame?

Well you'll blame anybody but yourself. The American left doesn't even
understand that IT is the reason, IT is the chief reason that Islam is
at war with the West. And what's really amazing to me is that the people
who have the most at stake in the battle against islamism, and the most
to lose if islamism wins, you the progressives so called, you're the
least able to fight it, the least willing to fight it.


You're the ones who hate the Pentagon, you're the ones who hate the
Whitehouse, you're the ones who hate the State Capitol, the national
Capitol, you're the ones who hate Israel. And yet the F-16's that fly
overhead are there to protect you from the islamists who would cut your
throat and throw you down a well. The very values of the West, forty
years of civil rights, gay rights, feminism, reproductive choice, that's
abortion, sexual madness called freedom, the right not to worship if
you don't want to worship, in other words the marxist left's wild dream,
is protected by the very elements that you hate in this country. You the
sexually unorthodox, you the bohemian, you the poet, you the professor,
you are protected by those F-16's. You are protected by the boys who
go to church and went to church every Sunday. You are protected by the
rock rib conservatives in this country who fly over your head, who are
dying in Iraq for your sins. Civil rights, gay rights, privacy rights,
abortions, sexual madness, the right to worship or not to worship,
all protected by the boys from somewhere else who you spit at, who
you sneer at, who you mock. They're the reason you're alive, and the
reason they're dying is because of your sins. The verminous left, the
Larry Flynt left as now adopted by the Democrat party itself, the Larry
Flynt left is now the official party platform of the Democrat party. I'm
not fooling you. Everything that Larry Flynt and his ilk stood for in
the 60's and 70's has been adopted if not overtly then covertly by the
Democrat party. They have accepted this debased destroyed West.  They not
only have accepted it as the norm, they welcome it. It's the marxist
dream. The death of the family, the death of heterosexuality. Everything
that the left dreamed of has come to pass in this country.

Hit hardest the black people. Seventy percent of black children are
born out of wedlock.  The American left celebrate this. CELEBRATE
this as a sign of liberation that they have been liberated from the
binds of bourgeois marriage. The Muslims are saying hell no we won't
go. You're not going to pollute our children. You're not going to turn
our children into Jezebels, you're not going to turn our daughters into
whores and our sons into homosexuals. We're not going to let you do
it. We'll kill you before you do it. You're not turning our sons into
little homosexuals. You're not going to brainwash our children. We'll
send them to Muslim schools. You're not turning our daughters into whores,
we'll send them to Muslim schools. We're not going to let our daughters
dress like Britney Spears, we're not going to let them behave like Paris
Hilton. We don't like them, we think they're vermin, we think they're
garbage, we don't care that they're held up as role models. We detest
them, we hate them, we think they're the most disgusting human beings on
the planet. We'll not send our children, we won't even go to the movies,
we won't turn on the television set. Incidentally the orthodox Jews
have the very same view. So the American left which is able to get away
with these behaviors and sell these behaviors is protected by the very,
let us say, Christian right that they detest and sneer at in their F-16's
and their tanks and behind their machines guns, if you want to put it
in that crude sense. And of course they continue to not recognize that
they have brought about Islam's rage.

No it's not Israel per se that the Muslims really care about, it's not
"territory" it's not "land". That's what the left will tell you, that the
Jews "stole" the land of the Muslims. That's the simple archaic notion of
the American left. It's that Israel's left wing social premise and left
wing social freedoms that threaten Islam in the middle east. They don't
want it spreading. They don't want a homosexual parade down the streets of
Damascus. They don't want a gay rights parade in Tehran! They don't want
boys tongue kissing each other in their nation's capitals. They'd rather
die than let that happen.  So they say death to Israel. They don't really
know what Israel is. Israel's an idea. It's not that their grandfather's
olive grove was taken, it's that their grandfather's PURITY was stolen
by the infection of the West's social morays. And they don't want them
in their villages, they don't want them in their homes, they don't want
them on Al-Jazeera, and they're not going to let you do it to them.
No matter what the madmen who run these media empires may think, Islam
will never tolerate the sewer pipe that comes out of New York City,
and the sewer pipe that comes out of Hollywood's sewer factories will
never penetrate the Muslim world, nor should they. But that's what's
provoking Muslim rage.

It's not so much what the Pope said, it's what Larry Flynt did, by
hijacking the Supreme Court in my opinion. And every other left wing
civil libertarian lawyer in America who everyday goes about his business
of destroying the Christian morays, the Judeo-Christian morays of this
country with GLEE!  What fun they're having, the boys from NYU. The bright
boys from Columbia, and NYU, and Harvard Law, and Boalt Law School, all
the lowest places on earth, where they teach you how to defeat the other
man without firing a shot, without cutting his throat. You can actually
cut his throat. The lawyer learns to commit jihad without firing a shot,
and he learns it at NYU, Columbia Law, Harvard Law.  How to commit jihad
without firing a shot. How to decapitate the enemy without picking up
a rusty knife. Who was it who said give them a fountain pen instead of
a gun and he can steal more money?  Well those were the old days. Just
give him a judge that he owns.

- Michael Savage

For those who don’t know who Michael Savage is, he is an Ultra-conservative radio talk show host who hates gays, Muslims, liberals, corporations (specifically the ones that aren’t sponsoring him) and movies that win Oscars, apparently. Yesterday, in response to the Oscar picks, he was going on about how movies are leading to the moral decline of America because they feature stories that are sympathetic to villains, support unwed motherhood and lack true white (Caucasian) patriotic heroes. He therefore called for the reinstitution of the United States Motion Picture Production Code of 1930 which banned everything from depictions of safe-cracking and lustful kissing to content that did not uphold the sanctity of marriage. Upon reading the provisions it is clear that the code is a violation of the first amendment and is unconstitutional.
With regard to Savage, I personally find his speech completely intolerant, homophobic, racist and bigoted. But in America he should have the right to speak his mind. There is no question that he has benefited from the first amendment as he has invoked his right to free speech each time religious groups or GLAAD have sued him for defamation. This was this response in 2007 to a San Francisco Board of Supervisors resolution denouncing him;
“ Illiberalism is not only a mental disorder; it is fascist at its core. This schmuck says my comments are “symbolic of hatred and racism.” And they want the City to sue me for “symbolism.” There is no basis in American Law for such a suit but the larger point is the astonishing hate speech this putz is engaging in. To stop OPINION by threatening legal action is akin to using the power of the State to control thought and speech. This is something out of Kafka and the ex-Soviet Union. Moreover, this illegitimi is working on behalf of a foreign government AGAINST an American Citizen. Does this constitute harassment against me? My attorney will soon answer this question as I ponder suing the City of San Francisco”.
Seeing a clear contradiction in Savage’s reasoning I decided to call into his show and explain to him that his asking the government to censor movies he didn’t like was the same fascism that he apparently abhors. I began by reminding him that the type of censorship he was looking for was reminiscent of calls by Hillary Clinton, Joe Liebermann and Tipper Gore to ban violence in video games and that any time the government legislates personal morality that is fascist. What happened after that is difficult to discern, because we got into a big fight that ended up with my parts being muted out while he spoke, freely. Apparently, he’s only a champion of free-speech and expression when it agrees with him. A true American defends the speech of those with whom he or she disagrees. Two parts of the disagreement I would like to highlight, however, indicate just how delusional this man is.
He asked me if I liked watching people get sawed up by wood-chippers (a reference to a Cohen brothers film) to which I said, “no of course not”, to which he said “oh so we agree?”, and I answered, “no”. Confused he said “so we don’t agree?”, and I said “no it’s not for you or I to decide what people can and can’t see” To which he interrupted and said “OF COURSE IT IS UP TO ME, I’M IN THE MEDIA”.
While you are on the phone with these people you think that everything you are saying is making it on the air. But when the show played later in the evening and I could hear it, I found that they muted me whenever he spoke. At least one time they turned my mike back on mid sentence so that what was broadcasted from my end was nonsensical (which he made fun of). The end effect is to make the host seem intimidating to the caller as the caller does not speak when the host speaks…so no one heard me refute his point that “these movies are destroying children” by pointing out the obvious realization that children don’t watch Oscar movies because they are boring relative to the “hero” driven films they do watch like Transformers and Spider-man.
That aside, it should be no shock that he hung up on me while I was in mid-sentence. After doing so, he went on to make the point that I did not know the definition of fascism, saying; “fascism is the left- forcing me to watch these movies, my friend”. Obviously, no one is actually forcing Michael Savage to pay 10.00 dollars to see these films. No one is sewing his eyelids open and actually making him watch Michael Clayton. Like any good capitalist enterprise people vote with their hard-earned dollars, and if Hollywood is making films that don’t speak to the masses then they won’t be successful (a point I tried to make-but alas could not due to the muting of my phone). I know that I wasn’t interested in any of the Oscar films this year, and consequently did not see any of them. Those that know me know that I have an aversion to pretty much all best-picture winning films. However, just as Michael Savage has the right to continue spewing his hate speech, Hollywood has the right to produce films about gays, unwed mothers and violent-unamerican-psychopaths. For a man so obsessed with Kafka, Huxley and Orwell (as demonstrated by his constant references to “a brave new world” and “1984”) it is surprising that he fails to understand that fascism isn’t just the control he doesn’t agree with, but all forms of control. And by censoring his guests he is himself taking on the role of “big brother”. Most alarming, however, is his call for governmental control over the films we should be allowed to see. No one who truly understands and is informed by the writings of Orwell and Huxley could ever take such a position, and therefore I argue that it is Michael Savage that needs to be taught the definition of fascism. I should point out as a matter of extreme irony that Savage was awarded a “Freedom of Speech Award” by Talkers Magazine. Of course when C-SPAN would not play his pre-recorded speech (because they have a policy of not playing pre-recorded materials) he demanded his listeners protest C-SPAN’s censorship. Proving again that in Savage’s world censorship only applies when he’s the one being kept from speaking.