To: TChris
“Yeah, in this case I believe the guy went waaaaay over the line. You can’t go hunt the bad guy down and kill him after he stops threatening.”
Yup. Hubby’s going away for a long long time.
20 posted on
02/26/2008 8:40:08 AM PST by
Hacklehead
(Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
To: Hacklehead
wrong.... read the law: private citizens' permissible use of deadly force under the authority of RCW 9.01.200, 9A.16.020, or 9A.16.050 is not restricted and remains broader than the limitations imposed on peace officers." [1986 c 209 § 3.] The husband was excercising his right to apprehend a rapist in the event evidence was needed. Any evidence is now available in the aforementioned hospital bed.
66 posted on
02/26/2008 9:07:22 AM PST by
CRBDeuce
(an armed society is a polite society)
To: Hacklehead
Wait and see what the jury says.
80 posted on
02/26/2008 9:20:48 AM PST by
mad_as_he$$
(John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
To: Hacklehead
Not if i am on the Jury. I would give him a pass. Hold a knife to someones wife and you deserve to die. But then I would never be allowed on the Jury.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson