To: kiriath_jearim
They stress not to pull your gun if you don’t plan on shooting to kill. In this case it would have eliminated a threat, saved a chase, gas, wear and tear on truck and State prosecution charges.
4 posted on
02/26/2008 8:30:48 AM PST by
mcshot
(Missing my grade school desk which protected from nuclear blasts.)
To: mcshot
They stress not to pull your gun if you don’t plan on shooting to kill. In this case it would have eliminated a threat, saved a chase, gas, wear and tear on truck and State prosecution charges.They stress not to pull your gun if you don’t plan on shooting to kill. In this case it would have eliminated a threat, saved a chase, gas, wear and tear on truck and State prosecution charges.
That needed repeating.
42 posted on
02/26/2008 8:49:52 AM PST by
cpdiii
(roughneck, oilfield trash and proud of it, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, iconoclast.)
To: mcshot
“saved a chase, gas, wear and tear on truck...”
****
Yeah, the poor truck! LOL
To: mcshot
They stress not to pull your gun if you don’t plan on shooting to kill. In this case it would have eliminated a threat, saved a chase, gas, wear and tear on truck and State prosecution charges. The article says the guy fired one shot in the air, and another at the assailant.
He may not have had a clear shot at first. The first shot may have been to distract him from his wife.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson