Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TChris
"Yeah, in this case I believe the guy went waaaaay over the line. You can’t go hunt the bad guy down and kill him after he stops threatening."

Depends on when you assume the bad guy is no longer a threat. Clearly, our hero decided the guy was a threat as long as he was alive. I would probably feel the same if someone threatened my wife.

Last thing we need is the bad guys knowing all they have to do is run away to attack another day. Hunt 'em down and eliminate the problem is the only way to be sure the guy 'stops threatening'.

6 posted on 02/26/2008 8:33:06 AM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: GourmetDan

I think assume is the key word here.


48 posted on 02/26/2008 8:52:41 AM PST by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: GourmetDan

If someone threatens my family, I will hunt them down and kill them. I might wait for the police to do their job, I might not.


64 posted on 02/26/2008 9:07:02 AM PST by live+let_live
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: GourmetDan
Last thing we need is the bad guys knowing all they have to do is run away to attack another day.

Then he should have shot to kill instead of firing two warning shots, then chasing the guy down with his car.

This guy was in the wrong.

139 posted on 02/27/2008 6:59:16 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson