Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What is being done to increase the manufacture of gasoline?

Posted on 02/26/2008 4:30:47 PM PST by reaganator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-208 next last
To: Republic of Texas

Okay, Mexico could be a bad risk for a multi-billion dollar refinery.

That still leaves Canada, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Jamiaca, Trinidad and Tobago, etc, etc, etc.

True, they are islands in the Caribbean - and hurricanes love the Caribbean, but hurricanes also love the gulf coast - where we have many refineries already.

Heck, Recife in Brazil would be a great refinery point. No hurricanes, a big port, and a short hop straight north to our ports in Florida (or Mississippi, or Georgia, or Alabama).

I mean, we are already importing gasoline from European refineries because the US cannot produce enough from our own. At least this way, our money would stay with our own companies in America.


161 posted on 03/07/2008 12:41:36 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

I could not agree more.


162 posted on 03/07/2008 1:57:13 PM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Hey Larr, The world in not that full o' people Texas and World Population According to World Population Prospects (United Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations, 2005): By July 2005, the world will have 6.5 billion people. 1996 Statistical Abstract of the United States: Texas = 261,914 mi2 total land (minus lakes and rivers) This = 7,301,743,257,600 ft2. Thus if the worldÂ’s population were moved to Texas, each person could have 1123 ft2 to himself/herself. In other words, a box that is 33½ ft on either side. If world population tops out at 12 billion eventually, then each person could have 608½ ft2 in Texas ( = a box that is 24 ft on either side). For comparison purposes, note that in contemporary Bangladesh, there is 10,740 ft2 per person; in contemporary Hong Kong there are 1704 ft2 per person.  DonÂ’t forget, too, that Texas is big: slightly smaller than Turkey, slightly larger than Ukraine. AND: This does not include the land area each person needs to grow/extract the resources necessary to live, or space for industry, roads, shops, hospitals, parks, etc..
163 posted on 03/10/2008 11:08:17 AM PDT by kennyboy509 (Ha! I kill me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: reaganator

Why should they increase production when all they have to do is increase the price?


164 posted on 03/10/2008 11:09:23 AM PDT by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
There are no shortages of oil or gasoline. No more needs to be produced than is being produced.

Your answer is technically true only if prices are high and usage restrained. Supply and demand have reached equilibrium with gas prices over $3.00 per gallon and oil over $100. Absent an increase in supply or reduction in demand (a global recession), both of those levels will increase. Increase supply by 10% and the price would drop dramatically. The only time you could say supply is not the reason is when gas is unsold at a price below the cost of production.

Open exploration and drilling in Alaska, the Pacific coast and the gulf and the speculative pressure on oil will be released and the price of oil will drop by as much as 30% or more.

Reduce the restrictions on newly constructed refineries and it will reduce the overhead costs of production while increasing supply. The cost of gasoline will drop.

Increase the use of nuclear plants and the usage of oil for heating and electrical production will fall, increasing the availability of fuel oil for transportation.

Congress has not done one single thing that doesn't amount to an increased cost of production. Until they lift their boot from the neck of the system, prices will remain high and go higher. The laws of economics guarantee that.

165 posted on 03/10/2008 11:33:02 AM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganator
The high cost has nothing to do with supply and demand?

That is a ridiculous statement.

166 posted on 03/10/2008 11:34:42 AM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Why would they want to do that? They're enjoying record profits for not lifting a finger or spending a dime. If they increase production it would lower the price, that is if gasoline/oil was truly a free market.

Apparently you lap up the media line for breakfast every morning. Those record profits amount to $0.08 per dollar invested. The company (non-energy related) I work for would consider that a very bad year if that was as good as they could do. The huge profit numbers are because the business is so large, not because they they are getting a high return on investment. Take time to do the math once if you can stand having your world view shattered by the truth.

Increase their availability to oil, reduce restriction on new refinery construction and the overhead costs go down. They could make more per dollar invested than under the current highly restricted environment.

Over the past 15 years, there has not been a thing done in the US to promote an increase in supply while regulation after regulation have been implimented to restrict it. Now they are talking about a windfall profits tax. This only increases the cost of production and will come out of the consumers pocket. Idiocy!!!!

167 posted on 03/10/2008 11:43:19 AM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
No. There is not a situation of supply and demand. The supply is 100% and any more there would be no place to store it.

Prices are always a result of supply and demand, regardless of what creates the supply abundance or restriction. The laws of economics are laws, not suggestions. If gasoline were $1.80 per gallon the consumption in the country would increase dramatically, so there would not be a storage problem.

The supply available today is sufficient to meet a demand that is constrained by high price. Reduce the price and demand goes up, however the supply would not be able to meet the demand. Therefore the price does not go down.

168 posted on 03/10/2008 11:48:18 AM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CMAC51
The laws of economics guarantee that.

What are you going to do with 2 million extra barrels of oil every day? In a week there would be 14 million extra barrels of oil. Where will you put it? That's just for the USA of course. The world is 4X that and the USA is not the whole economic situation and nowhere near being self-sufficent nor capable of being so.

169 posted on 03/10/2008 11:49:57 AM PDT by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: okie01

There is intelligent life out there. Thank you for the blast of sanity!


170 posted on 03/10/2008 11:51:24 AM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CMAC51
The laws of economics are laws, not suggestions.

Economics is not a science. There are no laws of economics.

171 posted on 03/10/2008 11:51:32 AM PDT by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
What? More “Just-In-Time” inventory technique?

IMHO, this country will rue the day this approach to supply and demand was implemented for important products subject to critical interruptions brought about by unforeseen events.

172 posted on 03/10/2008 11:58:50 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (Maverick conservative without a political party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
I think he's asking where lies the bottleneck? Why can't we produce and refine more oil and thus drive down prices? Put another way, we have a 100% supply at current prices... but produce more at lower prices and consumption would certainly increase. As it is now many people are rationing their fuel use because they can't afford more.

The supply of oil is restricted because the US has some of the largest oil reserves in the world with the most advanced technology to harvest it and congress won't allow it to happen.

On the refinery side, the only increases in supply have resulted by improved efficiency at existing refineries and by running refineries and 90%+ of capacity. Production facilities should never be run continuously over 80% of capacity.

No new refineries are being built because of environmental restrictions. The overhead cost is too high. Every attempt by congress to relieve the restricitons are at least make them more logical and doable has been blocked by the Democrats.

Gas prices are high becasue Democrats want them high!

173 posted on 03/10/2008 12:00:04 PM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
but at least supply is matching demand. Supply is only matching demand because of the elevated price. If the price were $2.00 per gallon, demand would quickly outstip supply.
174 posted on 03/10/2008 12:02:06 PM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CMAC51

The price was $2 a gallon not long ago and demand didn’t outstrip supply. What is outstripped is that simplistic supply/demand diagram.


175 posted on 03/10/2008 12:06:05 PM PDT by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster

An example of media propoganda. Do the math. Take the price of an Exxon share times the number of shares outstanding. This gives you the total investment Exxon has. Then divide the profit number by the total investment. The net result is Exxon made $0.08 for every dollar invested. That is hardly a mind blowing number. The size of the profit total is so large because Exxon is huge, not because they are making a bundle per dollar invested. There are technology companies the make 25 - 30% profit per dollar invested an nobody screams about their obscene profits.


176 posted on 03/10/2008 12:09:29 PM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
What are you going to do with 2 million extra barrels of oil every day?

Sell it. What else? The US economy could absorb that without even a twitch if the price was right.

177 posted on 03/10/2008 1:37:21 PM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The price was $2 a gallon not long ago and demand didn’t outstrip supply.

What planet our you living on? Following Katrina and Rita, US refineries were running at what amounted to over 100% of capacity just to meet the demand. However, apparrenly on your planet, supply and demand along with the other laws of economics don't apply. That's fine, if you are happy out there in La la Land, more power to you. There is no point in me or any other rational being disturbing your world view.

178 posted on 03/10/2008 1:43:06 PM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: CMAC51
There is no point in me or any other rational being disturbing your world view.

LOL

179 posted on 03/10/2008 1:59:58 PM PDT by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
You are kidding right?

Because that is about the most ignorant statement I've read on FR...in a long while.

180 posted on 03/10/2008 2:04:33 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary's heart is darker than the devil's riding boots.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson