Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aussies turn big guns on Taliban
news.com.au ^ | 27th February 2008 | Peter Veness

Posted on 02/27/2008 1:10:47 AM PST by naturalman1975

AUSTRALIAN troops have been forced to use some of their heaviest firepower to fight Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan during a series of recent skirmishes, the Department of Defence says.

The soldiers have been using 81mm mortars, which can hit targets kilometres away but which have not been widely used by Australia since the Vietnam war.

No Australian soldiers were killed or injured in the fighting and it was not clear if any Taliban had been hit.

The Taliban have launched multiple simultaneous attacks during the past fortnight.

The raids have been aimed at a security post that soldiers from the Reconstruction Task Force (RTF) have been building about 15km from Tarin Kowt, in the Afghan province of Oruzgan.

Chief of Defence Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston praised the work of the soldiers.

"The immediate and aggressive response by RTF soldiers caused the enemy to break off their attack and abandon their weapons in hastily prepared caches.

"These (weapons) were recovered through aggressive follow-up patrolling, which was sustained for a number of days."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: anzac; taliban
These are army engineers - not front line combat soldiers, but they still know how to fight.
1 posted on 02/27/2008 1:10:49 AM PST by naturalman1975
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

The bigger the better. About time...


2 posted on 02/27/2008 1:14:43 AM PST by rusureitflies? (OSAMA BIN LADEN IS DEAD! There, I said it. Prove me wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rusureitflies?

3 posted on 02/27/2008 1:36:13 AM PST by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
"These are army engineers - not front line combat soldiers"

Trust me, combat engineers are front line troops. Who clears minefields, under fire, before the infantry pushes on? Who builds bridges, under fire, before the armor can proceed? I'll let you look up the rest.

yitbos

4 posted on 02/27/2008 2:04:09 AM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds. - Ayn Rand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

81mm is the biggest gun they have?

I thought Aussies were bigger men then that.

(Joke. I realize that the reporter is a moron.)


5 posted on 02/27/2008 2:11:07 AM PST by american_ranger (Never ever use DirecTV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

That’s a comment you would be best to say very, very softly if you’re within earshot of Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri.


6 posted on 02/27/2008 2:13:22 AM PST by shibumi (".....panta en pasin....." - Origen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american_ranger
". . . not been widely used by Australia since the Vietnam war"

Writer is lefty for sure. He probably saw green camo tube and thought Nam. But Aussies are in East Timur right now, also.

yitbos

7 posted on 02/27/2008 2:18:29 AM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds. - Ayn Rand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

And who gets the damned things to the engineers? Transportation, that’s who!

No such thing as a “non-combat support” MOS...


8 posted on 02/27/2008 2:23:46 AM PST by MacDorcha (Arm yourself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
AUSTRALIAN troops have been forced to use some of their heaviest firepower to fight Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan during a series of recent skirmishes

What.....are they supposed to save 'em for a parade, a wedding?

9 posted on 02/27/2008 4:29:41 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

They abandoned their weapons!?!?? Fantastic, now we can arm some more of our troops! </sarcasm meant to mock BHO>


10 posted on 02/27/2008 4:32:32 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Search for Folding Project - Join FR Team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
These are army engineers - not front line combat soldiers, but they still know how to fight.

Seabees have been that way for a long time. Proud to have been one, if only for a short time.

11 posted on 02/27/2008 4:35:49 AM PST by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Here’s hoping that OBL and all who also work with him are also defeated soon.


12 posted on 02/27/2008 4:36:48 AM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (Vote for conservatives AT ALL POLITICAL LEVELS! Encourage all others to do the same on November 4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

I’m retired Navy myself - and the fact is, I can fight, and, theoretically, even command, a decent infantry action as well if I have to (I did my share of armed boarding parties, but that was the closest I ever came to direct combat). I had the training, because there are situations in which even a sailor can find themselves down in the dust, facing armed enemies.

But I’d never claim to be a front-line combat soldier in the way an infantry soldier is.

Army Engineers are somewhere between the two of us, in my view. I’d expect them to do a good job in combat - as I say, I could do a decent job and I would expect them to do better than me - when they have to. And there are occasions, when they have to - when you need engineers in a place where’s there’s fighting, that’s where they’ll be.

But they’re not front-line combat wombats in the same way as infantry are.

But I’m not intending to disparage them - quite the opposite in fact.

The real reason I would make the distinction though is because elements of both the Australian and international media who are trying to present the planned withdrawal of about a third of Australia’s troops from Iraq as abandoning the war there - because what will be left will be people like Engineers, and people like I was - sailors, etc. Well, we might not have the same skills as infantry, but we still know how to fight, and we will still do it in any case, where it’s necessary.

This article highlights the fact that ‘support’ troops and ‘reconstruction’ troops are not less as soldiers than infantry. They just have different specialisations.

Any soldier is trained to pick up a rifle and fight. So for that matter is any sailor, or any airman.

Infantry are especially well trained at it, special forces even better - but we all know how to fight.


13 posted on 02/28/2008 1:07:51 AM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson