Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Take Aim at Oil Industry
WSJ ^ | February 27, 2008 | STEPHEN POWER , SIOBHAN HUGHES and IAN TALLEY

Posted on 02/27/2008 6:08:34 AM PST by Brilliant

With oil prices reaching new highs, House Democrats are taking aim at the oil industry ...in an effort to tap voter frustration over gasoline prices and oil-company profits.

...the House of Representatives is expected to approve a measure that would eliminate roughly $18 billion in tax incentives for oil and gas companies, and use the savings to fund tax credits and other incentives for renewable energy...

The measure comes as high energy prices put increased pressure on consumers. Oil yesterday finished at a new high of $100.88 a barrel in New York futures markets, putting it $2.88 below the inflation-adjusted high reached in April 1980. The average price of a regular gallon of gas this week was $3.13 a gallon, up about 75 cents from a year earlier...

Senate Democrats also held a hearing yesterday to put new pressure on the administration to take a tougher line against the industry in a dispute over royalties... Assistant Secretary of the Interior Stephen Allred told a Senate Appropriations subcommittee that as much as $31 billion is at stake in the dispute, which centers on leases issued to oil and gas companies for the right to drill in the Gulf of Mexico from 1996 to 2000.

Industry groups counter that the tax incentives help stimulate oil-field investment, add new supplies to the market and keep jobs in the U.S. "These tax increases seem particularly egregious at a time when we are trying to stimulate the U.S. economy..." said Mark Kibbe, a spokesman for the American Petroleum Institute...

The industry also argues it was adhering to U.S. royalty-rate policy in the late 1990s, when royalties were reduced to stimulate domestic drilling...

Congressional Democrats have also sought to slow down an administration plan to allow oil-and-gas drilling...

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; congress; democratparty; economy; energy; gasolineprices; gasprices; oil; taxincrease
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
Pelosi promised to reduce gas prices, but they are now more than 50% higher than they were when she was sworn in as Speaker. And what is she doing to reduce them? Notta, as far as I can see.

If the GOP were smart, they would play the John Galt trick on the Dems. Give them what they want, and watch them pay the price.

1 posted on 02/27/2008 6:08:36 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Rush made a very good point last week.

He wondered when democrats were going to go after the outrageous and unaffordable tuition fees at colleges and universities.
I guess one could refer to as “big education” if you wanted.

Oh yeah...that’s an industry run by liberals - so they get to soak the consumer for all they’ve got.


2 posted on 02/27/2008 6:10:46 AM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Oh, for pity’s sake. The Dems cry about the oil companies, yet refuse to drill in ANWR, or off the U.S. shore. Don’t believe the Dems are serious about getting the oil prices down at all.


3 posted on 02/27/2008 6:11:48 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

You’re exactly right. All this oil villification is Democrat propaganda. They’re getting their palms greased on oil (no pun intended) plenty.


4 posted on 02/27/2008 6:14:54 AM PST by J40000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

If they remove the tax incentives, won’t that cause the price of gasoline to INCREASE. These Democrats deserve an F- in economics.


5 posted on 02/27/2008 6:15:02 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Let’s blame farmers for high corn prices.

Producers don’t determine price... consumers do.


6 posted on 02/27/2008 6:16:35 AM PST by MeanGreen2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Um... won't upping taxes on oil companies just raise gas prices?
7 posted on 02/27/2008 6:17:26 AM PST by kevkrom (Voters say they want substance, but then they just vote for the guy with nice hair instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanGreen2008
Let’s blame farmers for high corn prices.

No. Let's give them subsidies. Shows how much RATS know about economics. This is scary stuff and what's more scary is that idiot voters in this country believe them.

8 posted on 02/27/2008 6:20:16 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

By all means, let’s take the tax incentives FROM the ONLY industry producing viable, cheap, efficient fuel for automobiles on the road... and give them to non-existent companies in an industry that has produced zero results that is not producing non-existent fuels to run non-existent vehicles.

Do I got this right?


9 posted on 02/27/2008 6:24:28 AM PST by MeanGreen2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The Democrats solution to high oil prices will be to "punish" big oil with new taxes. This will have several effects: Add to this new carbon taxes and $4 per gallon gasoline will seem a bargain.
10 posted on 02/27/2008 6:24:33 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Government mandates, regulates, taxes and interferes with the free market and then when prices are high the clueless sheople turn to the very people who caused the problem in the first place to "fix it".

Most politicians know there are many degrees of separation between the mandates they make and the consequences they cause so they will not be held to account for the messes they make and can even blame the evil oil company (insert any corporations: banks, health care, oil) and then make a money/power grab.
11 posted on 02/27/2008 6:25:00 AM PST by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

“eliminate roughly $18 billion in tax incentives for oil and gas companies”

Making it more expensive for O&G companies to find and produce hydrocarbons. Who will they pass that added expense on to?

Idiots


12 posted on 02/27/2008 6:27:24 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanGreen2008

“Do I got this right?”

yes...I think you got it right.
What’s wrong? You don’t trust the smartest woman in the world?
You don’t think she knows what’s best for us?
You trust those evil BIG OIL MEN!!

Donchaknow...if only women like Hillary ran things, everything would be cheap, there would be no wars, and no one would default on their mortgages.


13 posted on 02/27/2008 6:29:29 AM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Bush can’t sign this; it would then be tagged as the GOP raising gas prices.

No, Bush must veto and let the Dems override the veto if they can.


14 posted on 02/27/2008 6:36:08 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanGreen2008

This is true in the free market, but not in monopolies or cartels like OPEC.


15 posted on 02/27/2008 6:46:12 AM PST by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Eliminating these tax incentives is not such a bad idea. With the U.S. dollar weakening as it has been over the last couple of years, we may very well end up in a situation where U.S. taxpayers subsidize an oil industry whose primary source of revenue is the EXPORT of oil from the U.S. to foreign customers.


16 posted on 02/27/2008 6:48:20 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Dimocrat strategy= raise taxes, refuse to open new areas to drill, That should reduce fuel prices? I guess I am missing something here! If they think the oil companies are greedy but won’t pass the hike on to consumers? I think all of these folks rode the short schoolbus!


17 posted on 02/27/2008 6:51:33 AM PST by Quickgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Pelosi will get her come uppings sooner than later.
But she’ll try to place the blame on Bush. Everyone else does.
What the Democratic Left fails to see or acknowledge is one simple fact. They are impeding the oil companies from what they do best. Find the oil and extract it. Billions upon billions of barrels of oil have been found both in Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico and along the Atlantic shelf. Yet, our Democratic Party Congress has repeatedly refused the oil companies the right to drill.
Just how much does America spend each year purchasing oil from countries like Mexico, Venezuela, and Saudi Arabia?
The the Democrats have the temerity to claims that we are in deficit spending. Or, whine about the cost of fuel.
While we’re at it. I was always told that it was illegal for Cartels to be formed.
Let’s see, we have the Drug Cartel, the Muslim terrorist Cartel, and we also have the Oil Cartel. All illegal and all functioning. Yet, no one does a blessed thing about it.
18 posted on 02/27/2008 6:54:00 AM PST by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; Scotswife
GW and his coterie of inept communicators have handed the democrats this issue on a silver platter ... and now the VRWC is mad?

GW has been maddening imprecise and incoherent on "Energy" . When I twice-voted for this charmingly tongue-tied yutz, the very least I expected was a few new refineries to get the go ahead, or at least encouragement.

GW has made very ineffective use of the "Bully Pulpit," and shown no leadership on "Energy." He has even been wishy-washy on "Global Warming," never even contesting Al Gore's more outrageous unscientific scaremongering. Imagine the turn-around Mumbles Bush could pull off on this and other issues if he had the wherewithal to just come out and say "we need more refineries, there is no oil shortage, Global Warming is a crock, yes pollution is bad, but we don't have much in this country ... etc. etc."

Being a fighting democrat is extra easy when you have George Bush passing you the ammo. Thanks to him and the rest of the country-clubbers at the RNC, we face a very real danger of a wipe-out in the WH, House and Senate. Let's just pray that this good, but incoherent and nuance-deaf fellow somehow manages to go out with a bang and not just (yet another) whimper. .

If the GOP were smart ..... What ho? Prayer time again? If the GOP were smart, there wouldn't be a Nancy Pelosi and the oil-price problem, which has sunk previous administrations would never happen. What happened was "No Leadership."

19 posted on 02/27/2008 6:56:39 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (Dream Tickets: Gore/Obama vs. Petraeus/Blackwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Can’t say I disagree with one word of that.


20 posted on 02/27/2008 6:58:29 AM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson