Since you can't seem to see the difference between "private property" and the human-created benefits, including the limited financial liability, that comes from the artificial distinction that constitutes a "corporation", then we aren't going to agree.
Without the benefits to the non-owners, there would be no justification to permitting the limited liability of incorporation and such laws would not exist.
I, for one, support changing corporate laws so that corporations are prohibited from denying me the right to keep and bear arms at work that I presently enjoy at home.
There is no constitutional right to form corporations and enjoy limited financial liability. It's not a natural right and my right to defend myself from harm is.
What I want to see is to allow a corporation to exercise it’s private property rights in not allowing weapons on its property .... however, it now carries the RESPONSIBILITY for protecting it’s employees and as such, now carries the LIABILITY for failing to do so.