Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Struggling Sprint Reports Huge Loss
The Washington Post ^ | February 29, 2008 | Zachary A. Goldfarb

Posted on 02/29/2008 6:44:37 PM PST by FoxInSocks

Sprint Nextel yesterday reported a $29.45 billion fourth-quarter loss and said legions of subscribers continue to abandon its service, many because they can't pay their bills.

The nation's third-largest wireless carrier last year courted people with poor credit to boost its number of subscribers. Now the company is feeling the pain disproportionately as the economy weakens and consumers default on their debts.

Sprint said it expects 1.2 million wireless subscribers to drop their service in the current quarter, roughly the same number that left in all of 2007. The company offset losses by signing up new customers, but it has steadily lost ground to its two main rivals, Verizon Wireless and AT&T.

<snip>

Sprint yesterday announced its latest effort to recruit more customers, a $99.99 unlimited voice and data plan. Sprint has been searching for ways to differentiate itself from its competitors, much as AT&T got a leg up by making an exclusive deal to carry the Apple iPhone.

Sprint has struggled since it purchased Reston-based Nextel in 2005. The two cultures did not blend well and customers complained about the quality of Sprint's service.

<snip>

He said the company loosened its credit requirements last summer to attract customers with poor or little credit histories. Sprint ended the year with 53.8 million total subscribers, 700,000 more than it had in 2006. It made up for the loss of core monthly contract subscribers by adding less-lucrative prepaid and wholesale accounts.

"We have a lot of subprime customers in our customer base and we were disproportionately hit hard versus other carriers," Hesse said.

<snip>

Analysts referred to Hesse's strategy as a "kitchen sink" approach: presenting the bleakest picture possible in hope of showing progress in the coming months.

<snip>

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: nextel; sprint; telecom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
I wouldn't think that a sophisticated American corporation could not foresee the consequences of extending credit to such a risky pool. They made some money in the short run, but now the company is obviously hurting.

At least the federal government hasn't intervened to save all the poor people from having their latest-and-greatest cell phone service cut off. Yet.

Regarding their newest recruitment idea, I'm skeptical that people will flock to Sprint and and sign up for $100/month contracts, but hey, I'm a simple guy.

As an aside, my own experience with Sprint over the past six years or so has been trouble free. <knock on wood> I've stayed with them primarily because I can't get a comparable rate elsewhere, but I'm starting to wonder (again) how much longer Sprint will be around.

1 posted on 02/29/2008 6:44:39 PM PST by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

This is almost as good as Circuit City. They fired their sales force and then wondered why sales plummeted.


2 posted on 02/29/2008 6:46:43 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

Just damn! Does this mean the NASCAR cup will be changing it’s name again next year!!!


3 posted on 02/29/2008 6:48:26 PM PST by saganite (Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

They need a unliminted 25 dollar plan.


4 posted on 02/29/2008 6:48:53 PM PST by winodog (We have been set up for Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

I am from the Overland Park Kansas area where Sprint has its prison looking headquarters and I can tell you this—it is a very poorly managed company and people are leaving not because they cannot pay the bills but because they can’t get service in many locations.........it makes them upset..........


5 posted on 02/29/2008 6:49:26 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks
We have a lot of subprime customers in our customer base and we were disproportionately hit hard versus other carriers,"

Maybe if these phone companies offered decent rates and didn't try to lock people in, they wouldn't have to dig for people with bad credit.

6 posted on 02/29/2008 6:50:31 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

Didnt Sprint just make a huge acquisition of another carrier a little while ago? I would think purchasing that would make its debt for the quarter look alot worse than what it really is.


7 posted on 02/29/2008 6:52:19 PM PST by aft_lizard (born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

My problem with Sprint was their tech support. Everytime I called I got someone in Bangladesh who couldn’t speak English.

I also don’t like the fact that anytime I change my plan they extend my contract. They need to let me roll over my minutes too maybe. Something different.

They try to keep their customers by not letting them get out of their contracts instead of offering something to stay.


8 posted on 02/29/2008 6:52:23 PM PST by queenkathy (I will never give up and I will never give in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks
Sprint was just about the worst cellphone company to work with ~ one of their problems was communicating with customers about bill payment problems.

I had dozens of cellphones in the hands of our auditors, and if there were any problems at all (which would arise internally at the special sites where the organization made payments) Sprint made itself IMPOSSIBLE TO CONTACT.

It seemed to be their attitude that the only purpose customers had was to perfectly meld with their billing cycle and just shut up.

That, of course, was the wrong way to treat a federal agency with its own armed officers of the law, but they didn't care.

I doubt they've improved.

It's good they will soon disappear from "the corporate world". Bwahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

9 posted on 02/29/2008 6:52:31 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

“They made some money in the short run, but now the company is obviously hurting.”

In my limited experience of 38 years of Corporate endurance ‘short run’ is usually rewarded far more than long term gains.

The Japanese have done the opposite since perhaps the 50s.

Just sayin’

10 posted on 02/29/2008 6:52:55 PM PST by elpinta (Tagline temporarily out of service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

“They made some money in the short run, but now the company is obviously hurting.”

In my limited experience of 38 years of Corporate endurance ‘short run’ is usually rewarded far more than long term gains.

The Japanese have done the opposite since perhaps the 50s.

Just sayin’

11 posted on 02/29/2008 6:52:59 PM PST by elpinta (Tagline temporarily out of service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

They bought Nextel in 05. ALL of the resulting ripples from that should have settled by now.

And Sprint service continues to suck.


12 posted on 02/29/2008 6:53:39 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks
Didn't AT&T just layoff 4000 workers and close 1200 stores? I thought I saw that back in January.

I'm very happy with VZW and wouldn't think of switching.

After Altel gets bought and auctioned off, I think Sprint will be the next to fall. That will leave AT&T and VZW with room for one more, possibly a Google type venture. Any thoughts?

13 posted on 02/29/2008 6:53:53 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Hillary Clinton - It's OBAMAS Party and She'll Cry if She Wants to?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Wish I knew how the double posts get there...
:-(


14 posted on 02/29/2008 6:53:55 PM PST by elpinta (Tagline temporarily out of service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks
They had to court "poor credit" customers because of their terrible service.
15 posted on 02/29/2008 6:54:29 PM PST by stentorian conservative (Ignore Napolean's Dogs. . . Vote your conscience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IllumiNaughtyByNature

You forgot that we still have TMobile. And since that’s owned by the German government, I doubt it’s going away.

AT&T had too many stores in too many places. They needed to close down at least half of them - and they’ve done so. For example, you don’t need three AT&T stores in a 3/4 mile radius.


16 posted on 02/29/2008 6:56:46 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

I’ll tell you what my store sells sprint phones and their credit requirements are ridiculously lax. I qualify for five lines no spending limit and no deposit and I work part time and go to college.

Then I see customers who need to put down 250 dollars per line. How do you possibly screw your credit up to the point where that happens? It genuinally baffles me.


17 posted on 02/29/2008 6:58:26 PM PST by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Tmobile still has some of the metro 18-25 users but they are light years from being a business provider. That is where the gains are made. Getting a family of 4 is a lot different than getting 50-500 line deals with companies. VZW is marketed that that segment and AT&T also. Sprint, Tmobile and the others are going for consumer use and are getting left in the dust of the two mentioned as far as growth.

The side benefit to croporate lines is that families who have a corporate phone usually switch to be "in network" with the parents, etc.

18 posted on 02/29/2008 7:02:41 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Hillary Clinton - It's OBAMAS Party and She'll Cry if She Wants to?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: elpinta
In my limited experience of 38 years of Corporate endurance ‘short run’ is usually rewarded far more than long term gains.

Do you mean companies look for short-term gains to the detriment of long-term growth? I have a military background, not a corporate background.

Just askin'. :-)

19 posted on 02/29/2008 7:05:43 PM PST by FoxInSocks (B. Hussein Obama: The Paucity of Hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

Yes, most do, and it shows.
Them quarter profits reign!!!
Glad I am on my way out of that mentality.
Just research how the Japanese took on the automotive and steel industries: long term goals.


20 posted on 02/29/2008 7:11:14 PM PST by elpinta (Tagline temporarily out of service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson