Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Neidermeyer

“Ammortized over 20 years it isn’t bad ,, especially as the plant will need fuel only to keep the water boiling at night,, this is a huge black (ceramic?) boiler in the center of a field of mirrors ,, nothing to be replaced at a regular basis,, just Juan with a dustrag to keep the reflected heat from falling off.”

I didnt read far enough and thought they were using solar cells. Still I doubt the $1 billion includes operating costs and maintenance. We have a good source of energy, oil and fission. Its proven and our infrastructure already supports it.


80 posted on 03/01/2008 6:52:06 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver

We have a good source of energy, oil and fission. Its proven and our infrastructure already supports it.
*******************************************************
Agreed ,, coal (with scrubbers) is clean , cheap and abundant.. and nuclear is just flat wonderful... I see no need to do a project like this when a modern nuclear plant can generate many times the power for decades without interruption at a lower per kw cost. I’d like to reserve oil for things other than power generation... and drill like crazy to get more of it.


183 posted on 03/01/2008 4:00:30 PM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson