Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ex-snook
A President calling something a 'police action' or 'carrying out UN resolutions' to avoid a Congressional declaration doesn't cut it. Why not declare war?

Because a declaration of war as defined by international treaty (which Constitutionally we are required to honor if we agreed to it) ties our hands. It limits us to specific states and specific actors. An 'Authorization to Use Force' against violations of the laws of nations is Constitutionally sound (Article 1, Section 8, Subsection 10) but doesn't tie our hands in fighting a specific country, but instead, going against a movement that is not tied to a specific nationality and doesn't fight under a single flag.

16 posted on 03/04/2008 3:01:10 PM PST by mnehring ("Ronald Reagan has made Jimmy Carter look like a conservative..."- Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: mnehrling

The President does not have a private army at his disposal. A declaration of war unites the country. We should declare war on every country we bomb before we bomb them. Not like a Pearl Harbor. Bush already said any country that harbors terrorists is a terrorist country. So a WOT is just a war on words. involve Congress, Declare War, Unite the Country.


21 posted on 03/04/2008 3:11:30 PM PST by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson