More FBI Privacy Violations Confirmed

AP ^ | 05 Mar 2008 | Lara Jakes Jordan

[dfwgator]

Trading freedom for security results in losing both.

[LibertarianInExile]

“Id rather die free”

Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither BUMP!

[steve-b]

NO WAY that the FBI should be doing dirty work for creditors and former employers by using national security letters to conduct private, civil or other criminal style investigations of citizens' personal information

This impedes investigation of actual terrorist threats both directly (by diverting resources and crapflooding the system) and indirectly (by making it necessary to impose additional restrictions on FBI activities). Thus, it ought to be punished with the same severity as any other criminal conspiracy to aid terrorists.

[Still Thinking]

I'd rather have less privacy, and stay alive.

Then you deserve neither.

[Revelation 911]

Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither BUMP!

ABSOLUTELY

[bamahead]

Id rather die free AMEN.

[bamahead]

Note my tagline. You sound like the majority.

[Xenophon450]

Live Free or Die is just a bumper sticker, eh?

[Calvinist_Dark_Lord]

Id rather die free AMEN.

i'd rather make the b@$t@rd who would presume to take my liberty die, but i'd settle for Revelation911's choice if it comes down to it.

i didn't serve my country in uniform in various turd world $#!tholes to tolerate this kind of $#!t from my own government.

[MrB]

I have no problem if the FBI is looking for terrorists and look at my personal communications, etc. I’ll never know, and it would be a waste of their time to pursue me.

However, the way the Clintons used domestic intel for political purposes is criminal.

[WOBBLY BOB]

“security” to the next administration could me ‘only spitwad shooters for the populace’.