Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus
Breezed right by this part, didn't you?

"To slavery we have ever entertained the most rooted aversion. Not all the valour, not all the success of the South, has ever blinded us to this black spot on their fair escocheon. But even tainted as they are with this foul stain..."

The Palmerston government wouldn't recognize the confederacy so long as they retained their connection with slavery. Which meant that the Palmerston government would never recognize the confederacy.

145 posted on 03/13/2008 3:55:25 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Breezed right by this part, didn't you?

Uh, no. I quoted it. And you have the effrontery to tell me I "breezed right by" it?

Nice herring, btw -- what color was it before you painted it?

The Palmerston government wouldn't recognize the confederacy .....

But they almost went to war over the Trent affair.

They said they wouldn't recognize the Confederacy, like we said we wouldn't recognize Soviet Russia. And we didn't, for a long time.

It'll have to remain a matter of historical conjecture, whether your statement of Palmerston's determination is valid. A Confederate victory at Gettysburg, or a series of them -- Meade would have been expected to wreck his army, to keep the Confederates off Philadelphia -- might have clarified Lord Palmerston's view of the practical side of things. The British are amazingly dry that way.

177 posted on 03/14/2008 11:11:12 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson