Former teacher pleads guilty of sex with student

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH ^ | 03/06/2008 | Robert Kelly

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

If the Catholic Priest fiasco is any guide shouldn’t this school district be sued into oblivion?

Well, in fairness, no. The church hide and protected pedophile priests, moved them from parish to parish and obstructed criminal investigations. The actions of the church were so egregious as to transcend mere negligence or even passively condoning, they all but encourage the priests' behavior. Not at all comparable.

An employer is only responsible for actions of his employee that can be reasonably be construed as consistent with the employers policies or wishes, or if the employer fails to supervise the employee. Clearly the teacher was acting outside of her professional duties and against school district policies.

[sit-rep]

Slobbin' Der Nobbin!!

[redrunner]

All add her to the gallery....

[Revolting cat!]

I volunteer to make the sacrifice and counsel this wayward teacher!

[RichInOC]

...roll that beautiful Alex Van Halen drum intro...

[Revolting cat!]

The gallery? At least half of them are not guilty!

[Rome2000]

She looks fantastic in handcuffs.

[PzLdr]

She looks like she’d be fun to know.

[PzLdr]

Not Guilty! No Way! No how! And why would a 14 year old complain if he was tappin’ that?;

[PzLdr]

Put the ‘Cat’ in “Cat suit”!

[Norman Conquest]

Second that. In spades.

[day10]

Impressive! The first one in row 8, though......sheeesh.