I didn’t ask why you disagree with Laura.
I asked about what she _said_ on this particular issue.
I don’t care who the messenger is.
I’m wondering why the message upsets you so much.
And yes, your character is being revealed in this exchange. Insulting application of charged labels where plainly inappropriate, hostile responses to polite comments/questions, dancing around the core issue, focusing on the exact words used instead of the meaning intended, accusations of ad hominems, predictions of insults where none were indicated...just stick to the thread subject, would you please?
If a man needs something which he has sworn to only go to his wife for, and she fails to provide it, isn’t it understandable (albeit still wrong, contemptable, evil, vile, etc.) if, pressed by a deep-seated physiological need, he gets that need met elsewhere? (and please don’t go on attacking me, I’m looking for a discussion of this question - not the messengers - and why the idea in the question upsets certain people so much.)
Again? I'm upset now? I'll let this stand. It speaks for itself and, dare I say it, reveals your character.
Let me put this in political terms since this is a political forum. I'm a conservative. I believe in personal responsibility. To blame anyone other than the wrongdoer for a wrong act is puerile -- not to mention a well-known liberal tactic. And to agree with this blame shifting when it's espoused by others suggests a liberal tendency in your thought processes.
hostile responses to polite comments/questions
I'm merely responding in kind to your comments to me. I'm holding up a mirror and you don't even recognize your own words. Review your posts. You've been insulting from the get-go. I'm sorry the truth upsets you.