Replies

>>WND observed about 25 ACIEP members, including U.S. corporations involved in international trade, prominent U.S. business trade groups, law firms involved with international business law, international investment firms and other international trade consultants.<<

And then in October or November they have the actual ACE awards where the Secretary of state shows up.

It makes me wonder did WND know all this and not publish it or do they know even less about the ACIEP’s schedule than I do? I’m guessing they knew if they were able to identify that many ACIEP members by sight - I couldn’t do that. Although it seems like they would have identified the corporations.

I would guess this was preparatory meeting for the meeting in July ACIEP has held for last 10 years (at least) where an assistant Secretary of State thanks the ACIEP for making the nominations for the Secretary of State’s Award for Corporate Excellence (ACE) and to update the ACIEP members on economic developments like G-8 and World Economic summit. That meeting is usually in July.

Guessing is far from knowing. It also ignores what we do know as fact is they did discuss the SPP. Per Corsi's report: "The meeting agenda included topics reviewing the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, and the U.S.-EU Transatlantic Economic Council, or TEC."

We also know per Corsi's report the purpose of the SPP. "The SPP, declared by the U.S., Canada and Mexico at a summit meeting in 2005, has 20 trilateral bureaucratic working groups that seek to "integrate and harmonize" administrative rules and regulations on a continental basis." That just socialist spin for dissolving national sovereignty.

It makes me wonder did WND know all this and not publish it or do they know even less about the ACIEP’s schedule than I do?

It makes me wonder why if the scenario you present is accurate then why would they invoke the "Chatham" Rules" for something so harmless?