I agree but I still believe that it will be doomed to failure unless it can capitalize on early break outs with planning and organization. After the first few battles many will bail as they do not have the stomach for it. Leaving a splintered guerrilla force to do what? What would be the objective of such a force? Who or what would they go after? Is controlling ground important or causing chaos? 980,000 LEO’s in this country tactics and planning will be key in causing change.
If the LEOs do not denounce the governments violations of our rights, then they are not on our side.
Have you been in the military? One thing that training made plain is that an ambush is a force multiplier. One person is equal to three or more if surprise is on the side of the one. Will the LEOs be forced to go in groups of four or more? Then the number of effective LEOs has been reduced from 980,000.
If people like you or me decide to cause trouble, given how law-abiding we would normally wish to be, just how many such people would there be?
How well are these LEOs doing in eliminating the radicals who support freeing lab animals or spiking trees to prevent logging? Do you think the trouble is being caused by a million such people? I think it is just a handful.
A million unhappy gunowners or a half-million? That's not a law-enforcement problem; it's an insurrection. What will the standing military do about this? Are they prepared to mount an effort similar to what is going on in Iraq right here in their own neighborhoods? In order to disarm the American people?
I was in the military. If the military had been oppressing the American people, I would have been a serious problem; to the military.