Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama doesn't have ‘race problem' — GOP does (Huh?)
Politico ^ | 3/14/08 | Sophia Nelson

Posted on 03/14/2008 10:31:51 AM PDT by pissant

Now that Sen. John McCain has clinched the GOP nomination, an 800-pound political elephant looms in the room. Will America stick with 220 years of tradition and elect as our next president a white male — in this case, a 71-year-old senator and decorated war hero? Or does Barack Obama — an energetic, visionary, 46-year-old African-American senator from Illinois with no prior military service — have a shot at the brass ring?

While I do not count Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) out of the race, Obama is leading in pledged delegates, and Democrats would be committing political suicide with black voters by denying him the nomination at the national convention Aug. 25-28 in Denver. If Obama becomes the nominee, the Republican Party will face the most difficult election in its 150-year history.

Why? The GOP’s dilemma is how to effectively run the red state campaign that it has become so accustomed to — and successful at — over the past 35 years. GOP campaigns since the late 1960s have made the politics of race a centerpiece of national elections. It’s an issue I am particularly sensitive to, as an African-American woman who has been active in the Republican Party since I was 18 (I cast my first presidential vote for George H.W. Bush in 1988).

Recall how that year the Willie Horton episode became a racially tinged issue against the eventual Democratic nominee, Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis. Sen. Al Gore of Tennessee was the first to raise the issue of “weekend passes for convicted criminals” at a Democratic primary debate, though he never mentioned Horton’s name or that he was black.

But the brief debate exchange attracted the interest of Republican opposition researchers, who developed an “independent expenditure” ad showing a grainy, dark picture of Horton. The official Bush campaign, of course, kept its distance from such efforts and claimed to use Horton only in race-neutral ways. But it still benefited from this racially divided approach in defeating Dukakis.

The trend toward polarized politics had been building for decades. Until the 1960 election, the Republican Party enjoyed the support of at least 50 percent of black voters. But in that year’s closely contested presidential race, Republican nominee Richard Nixon refused to call Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in the Georgia jail where the civil rights leader was imprisoned on a technicality.

Democratic nominee John F. Kennedy, meanwhile, called Coretta Scott King to express his support for her husband. Kennedy’s phone call prompted Dr. King’s father, a prominent Atlanta pastor, to endorse the Democratic ticket, which won a majority of black votes in the South.

When Nixon sought a comeback in the 1968 presidential election, he appealed to the so-called “silent majority” (e.g., suburban and Southern whites, conservatives) and promised he would restore “law and order” in America’s cities as well as achieve “peace with honor” in Vietnam.

By 1972, Nixon and his aides understood clearly that they had to attract the “Wallace voters” to the GOP fold (segregationist Gov. George Wallace of Alabama in 1968 carried his home state and Georgia, Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi). Through this “Southern strategy,” Nixon and his campaign aides used race as a wedge issue in national elections to swing traditionally Democratic voters (e.g., blue-collar, white working-class citizens) to the GOP.

Republicans have even used “race” issues against their own members. During the 2000 South Carolina Republican primary, thousands of independent-expenditure calls were made to white voters suggesting McCain, chief rival of front-runner George W. Bush, had fathered a black baby — a play on the McCain family’s adoption of a baby girl from Bangladesh on one of Cindy McCain’s goodwill trips to the region. Although the Bush campaign denied any ties to the calls being made against McCain, the result was that McCain lost a bitter primary fight in South Carolina and, effectively, the GOP nomination.

Race is rearing its head again this campaign cycle. Politico reported Feb. 25 that top Republican strategists have commissioned polls and focus groups to determine the acceptable boundaries of attacking a minority or female candidate as they prepare for a presidential campaign against the first-ever African-American or female Democratic nominee.

What concerns me are the clear racial and “identity politics” voting trends we saw in the March 4 primaries in Ohio, Texas and New England. According to MSNBC, 20 percent of Ohio voters said that “race was an important factor in how they voted”; of those, 75 percent voted for Clinton. In Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island, white female voters and white male voters strongly coalesced around Clinton’s candidacy. Likewise, African-American voters still overwhelmingly supported Obama’s candidacy.

Rhetoric from political leaders fuels voter sensitivity to race and ethnicity, and conservative leaders have not been quiet about Obama’s identity.

Republican Rep. Steve King, for one, has said that Al Qaeda would welcome Obama’s election. “The radical Islamists, the Al Qaeda ... would be dancing in the streets in greater numbers than they did on Sept. 11, because they would declare victory in this war on terror,” King said in an interview with the Spencer, Iowa, Daily Reporter. King suggested that Obama’s middle name, Hussein, would have a special meaning for “radical Islamists.”

“His middle name does matter,” King said. “It matters because they read a meaning into that.”

Conservative radio hosts have further inflamed the race question. Shock jock Bill Cunningham famously said at a McCain rally, “We will rip the bark off of Barack Hussein Obama.”

“Sean Hannity’s America” has attacked Michelle Obama’s comments about being “proud of America for the first time,” her writings on feeling “isolated as a black student at Princeton,” Louis Farrakhan’s statement that he supports Obama for president, and controversial sermons by Obama’s pastor, Jeremiah Wright, on black family unity and pride. Hannity categorizes such support as Obama’s “race problem.”

In another example, conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh speculated March 6 that the Democratic ticket could include both Clinton and Obama. “Therefore, you’ve got a woman and a black for the first time ever on the Democrat ticket,” Limbaugh said. “Ahem. They don’t have a prayer.”

America is still clearly not comfortable discussing race out in the open, and it becomes more glaring as each day goes by in this historic campaign for president of the United States.

My advice to McCain is this: Let the 2008 campaign be remembered as the one in which the GOP abandoned its Southern, red state strategy, when the party’s nominee used “straight talk” to set a tone and vision for the general election that is truly inclusive of all Americans.

As a maverick senator who has a unique life story of overcoming adversity, he must be willing to substantively, constructively and compassionately take our party’s philosophy of a strong national defense, strong economy, educational choice, strong families, homeownership and entrepreneurship to black communities urban and suburban alike. It’s time to stop writing them off as Republicans have for the past 40 years.

McCain has a golden opportunity to prove that black Americans, female voters and other historically disenfranchised citizens can embrace the GOP’s message of strength and opportunity for all. This would not only be historic; it would rid the party of the shame and stigma it has borne for far too long relative to race and bring the party back to its great beginnings under President Abraham Lincoln.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: hussein; identitypolitics; jeremiahwright; larrysinclairslover; leftistsareracists; magicnegro; nobama; obama
Yeah, the party that has had "Condamnneesha" head of NSA and now State has a real race problem. But the party that calls her and Clarence Thomas and Colin Powell 'uncle toms' has no problems
1 posted on 03/14/2008 10:31:53 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Barack 12th Imam Obama

You stinking anti American bigot.

2 posted on 03/14/2008 10:36:53 AM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

My advice to McCain is this: Let the 2008 campaign be remembered as the one in which the GOP abandoned its Southern, red state strategy

In other words, don’t do what it takes to win..


3 posted on 03/14/2008 10:37:28 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (If the left doesn't want me to say Barack HUSSEIN Obama, I WON'T say HUSSEIN..I promise,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

To the author:

In 1997, Colin Powell could have had the Presidency with the simpple answer of Yes to the question of whether he was running as a Republican. Possibly a fifty state sweep. He decided not to run, but that is not the fault of the Republican party.

As far as race baiting goes, look to your Democrats as they have been doing it since 1865. Read some history before you put pen to paper.


4 posted on 03/14/2008 10:37:32 AM PDT by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

If BRRRRAACK Obama is a visionary, I sure don’t like his vision.


5 posted on 03/14/2008 10:38:05 AM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands
America is still clearly not comfortable discussing race out in the open, and it becomes more glaring as each day goes by in this historic campaign for president of the United States.

Should read liberal America. So far the rest of us have stayed out of the fray

6 posted on 03/14/2008 10:38:19 AM PDT by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Don't read made up crap from the politico!
7 posted on 03/14/2008 10:38:29 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I cant believe I read everything posted. What a load of tripe..


8 posted on 03/14/2008 10:38:44 AM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

First, I question the veracity of some of these “incidents”. And even if they are true, this handful of examples are tiny in comparision to the endless race and identity politics of the Dems.


9 posted on 03/14/2008 10:40:17 AM PDT by Toskrin (Bringing you global cooling since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Obama does have a race problem. He’s ashamed of his whiteness.


10 posted on 03/14/2008 10:40:25 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Where are they hiding Obama’s white half?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Conservatives aren’t going to vote for anyone as liberal as either Hillary or Obama.

Obama’s problem will be getting the Robert Byrd wing of his own party to vote for him.


11 posted on 03/14/2008 10:41:40 AM PDT by SmithL (That's my story & I'm sticking to it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

People like the author of this piece are unfortunately typical supporters of leftist victimology. It is not the responsibility of blacks or hispanics or whatever to study issues and candidates. It is the responsibility of the candidate to provide a gimme to get their vote. Muslim organizations are using the same tactic. It is not their fault that Islam is not looked upon favorably. It is the fault of non-Muslims for not accepting the BS they dish out.


12 posted on 03/14/2008 10:42:30 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I guess us angry white men cannot claim that title any longer.


13 posted on 03/14/2008 10:42:33 AM PDT by SF Republican (Conservatives wanted all or nothing, and they got it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

You can be guaranteed that McCain has no plans to “do what it takes” to win -

he might as well just hand the election to Obama as soon as (if) he gets the nomination,

otherwise, running against the black man is just being racist.


14 posted on 03/14/2008 10:42:47 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

She’s prejudiced against 800lb. Elephants. Very depressing. Where’s Congress on this?


15 posted on 03/14/2008 10:43:51 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
This moron apparently enjoys being on the DemonRat Plantation. Jim Crow laws were instituted and enforced by Democrats. Senator Byrd Turd was a Grand Kleagle in the KKK. Who knows how many blacks were lynched and terrorized while he was helping to run the show?


16 posted on 03/14/2008 10:44:22 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY ((((Truth to a Liberal, is like a crucifix to a vampire))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"Democrats would be committing political suicide with black voters by denying him the nomination at the national convention Aug. 25-28 in Denver."

Yep, and they call us racist but if things really get ugly in Denver how many cities will riot? LA burned over the Rodney king beating, this will be seen by a lot of people if he loses the primary as even a bigger smack down, even if it was a fair vote.

Yes, if Barack is denied then this place could go up like a tinderbox, even though it is their own party that is doing it to them. Maybe I will use my free money the Government is going to mail me to stock up on some ammo, you know, just in case.

17 posted on 03/14/2008 10:44:45 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

What tripe. I guess Sophia hadn’t heard the Sink Emperor, Bob Kerrey or Ferraro’s comments. *shaking head*


18 posted on 03/14/2008 10:46:07 AM PDT by eureka! (This primary has turned into a real depressing experience. *sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
“While I do not count Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) out of the race, Obama is leading in pledged delegates, and Democrats would be committing political suicide with black voters by denying him the nomination at the national convention Aug. 25-28 in Denver.”

In other words she believes most blacks vote based on the color of a candidates skin, by race. I wonder if blacks are really as racist as she thinks?

19 posted on 03/14/2008 10:50:48 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
By 1972, Nixon and his aides understood clearly that they had to attract the “Wallace voters” to the GOP fold (segregationist Gov. George Wallace of Alabama in 1968 carried his home state and Georgia, Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi). Through this “Southern strategy,” Nixon and his campaign aides used race as a wedge issue in national elections to swing traditionally Democratic voters (e.g., blue-collar, white working-class citizens) to the GOP.

If the GOP was the party of racism, how come when Wallace won 5 southern states in the 1968 presidental election as an independent, Nixon, the Republican, still won the election? It's because Wallace, the independent, took votes away from Humphrey, the Dem, not Nixon. Nixon, BTW, was the one who honored Rosa Parks.

20 posted on 03/14/2008 10:52:28 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
It’s an issue I am particularly sensitive to, as an African-American woman who has been active in the Republican Party since I was 18 (I cast my first presidential vote for George H.W. Bush in 1988).

LOL, yeah right.

21 posted on 03/14/2008 10:52:35 AM PDT by Sloth (Senator He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, D - Illinois)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Interesting, but very one-sided commentary. It appears that Sophia Nelson may be a Democrat in Republican clothing...

The Democrats are reaping the whirlwind for the way they have used the Negroes/African-Americans/Blacks for the last 40+ years. Ms Nelson did not include LBJ in her essay...

Ronald Kessler in his book ‘Inside the White House’writes “Once, while on a trip with two governors, Johnson reportedly made the following comment in explaining why the civil rights bill was so important to him. He
said it was simple: ‘I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years.’ ”

Using racism as a lever they are about to functionally take over the Democrat party. White guilt is their best weapon and it may work... even inside the closed voting booth.

22 posted on 03/14/2008 10:53:39 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
A minor addition:

...segregationist Democrat Gov. George Wallace of Alabama...

23 posted on 03/14/2008 10:54:29 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Obama’s pastor sure has a race problem.


24 posted on 03/14/2008 10:58:06 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The truth is quite the opposite. The DNC is the party of Jim Crow race repression, historically, and continues to be the party of race obsession. They see everything in terms of race and ethnicity, and refuse to believe anyone could possibly be otherwise.

That is the lens that colors their politics and their world view.

The south was once uniformly Democrat. That essentially changed as the civil rights struggle reached its climax and southern voters began to join by the thousands the GOP. Did joining the GOP mean that Republicans had suddenly become segregationists? No. It meant that those voters who accepted the GOP view of color-bind citizenship no longer belonged in the DNC. Once race was removed from the equation, other issues become paramount, the Cold War, for example, and people who were traditionally patriotic abandoned the DNC.

Not all of them. If a few renowned “dixie-crats” accepted the GOP view of race and color-blind citizenship, a host of others did not and still to this day do not, and they have remained in the DNC.

Look, if you were the party of lynch mobs, firehoses, Kleegles and Klansmen, you’d want to forget it too. The DNC spends every effort trying to convince themselves and their party faithful that somehow that stain isn’t theirs, and the party that opposed them for a century has somehow assumed their guilt. They get away with it because no one challenges them on it, even Republicans seem not to understand their own history.

Get this straight. We were on the right side of history. We won. We are still on the right side of it. And when a Dem finally gets it, finally understands the concept of color-blind citizenship and individual as opposed to collective citizenship, he is about half a degree away from becoming a Republican.


25 posted on 03/14/2008 11:00:02 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

C’mon....Barry believe this is the best country in the world and wants to change that!


26 posted on 03/14/2008 11:05:08 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (I'm a RINO cuz I'm too conservative to be a Republican. McCain is the Conservatives true litmus test)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Obama has his own racist pals to contend with before he starts throwing rocks ...

http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=12893

THE WRIGHT STUFF
Before Sen. Barack Obama announced his presidential ambitions, according to a former Obama campaign adviser, advisers sought to distance their man from his Chicago church, the Trinity United Church of Christ, and its controversial pastor, Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr., whom Obama has previously identified has his spiritual adviser.

“The United Church of Christ was going to be a bit of a problem no matter what, because it’s so liberal,” says the former adviser. “But Trinity and Wright were going to be an even bigger problem.”

It was such a concern, says the adviser, that some Obama aides proposed that the Obama family shift churches from Chicago to one in Washington, D.C. that would be politically less controversial.

“The problem is you have tithing records in Chicago, you have the fact that Senator Obama and Reverend Wright are so close, that the shift would have just seemed too contrived and politically cynical. That isn’t what this candidate is about.”

But Trinity and Wright have created and will create problems for Obama, though the United Church of Christ is a church that certainly fits with the candidate’s radical, leftist roots. For example, the UCC helped to found not only the nation’s, but the world’s largest gay and lesbian house of worship, the Cathedral of Hope in Dallas, Texas.

“The things the Clinton campaign have attacked us on are the things we were prepared for,” says the former adviser. “Trinity, his close financial and ideological relationship to former SDS members, we knew it all going into this, and they haven’t disappointed. But it hasn’t mattered too much. It may in a general election, but it hasn’t hurt us yet.”


27 posted on 03/14/2008 11:05:31 AM PDT by WOSG (William F Buckley: A great conservative, may he rest in peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan
"visionary = DREAMER

Good advice from lyrics of an old song..."Don't Fall In Love With A Dreamer..."
28 posted on 03/14/2008 11:34:42 AM PDT by FrankR (Let's see...RINO? SOCIALIST?, RINO? SOCIALIST?...wow how do I EVER choose? /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

If BRRRRAACK Obama is a visionary, I sure don’t like his vision.”

Barack’s vision ability needs to clear up the cobwebs on Sunday’s when he sits in front of his pastor Wright and spends hours listening to anti-American diatribe.


29 posted on 03/14/2008 11:40:24 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marron
"They see everything in terms of race and ethnicity, and refuse to believe.... otherwise."

Sounds similar to those who point the finger at 'race' and genes as the dominant* determinant of IQ.....

As for the comment about Obama being ashamed of his 'whiteness'--oh, come ON. Almost any American, if they hadn't heard of Obama before and saw him walking down the street, do you honestly believe they would call him 'white' or even 'half white?' They would call him 'black,' and you [probably] know that.

*Note, dominant determinant; not stating that there is not any role to play for genes in intelligence ('race' is another case; a 'black' could have the intelligence genes characteristic of northeast Asians or Ashkenazim while a northeast Asian could have the intelligence genes characteristic of sub-Saharan Africans). However, of the opinion that a genetic role is only minor, and the science can be used to support that argument every bit as strongly (if not more so) as the argument that genes are the primary factor in determining IQ.

Personal note: ought to stop reading threads that will obviously have racially ignorant, if not full-fledged racist, comments. Bad. Baaaaaaaaad. Those threads should not be read.

30 posted on 03/14/2008 11:52:41 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Toskrin
First, I question the veracity of some of these “incidents”. And even if they are true, this handful of examples are tiny in comparision to the endless race and identity politics of the Dems.

B/c there's a difference between "the truth" and "the whole truth".

31 posted on 03/14/2008 11:57:10 AM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Or does Barack Obama — an energetic, visionary, 46-year-old African-American senator. . .

LOL Obamie is just as much white as he is 'African-American'.

32 posted on 03/14/2008 12:41:38 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson