Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It’s john who pays in Sweden
Buffalo News ^ | 03/16/08 | By Karl Ritter

Posted on 03/16/2008 7:15:48 AM PDT by NYpeanut

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last
To: coloradan

In the case of child prostitution you’d probably agree that is also a transaction made on false information.

Sure, they can’t give consent because they don’t possess it.

They sure do possess consent when they buy something from a candy store. You’re not suggesting that those transactions are invalid. So why is child prostitution different?


61 posted on 03/18/2008 5:41:00 AM PDT by ari-freedom (McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

It’s not made on false information, it’s made on ignorance, because children are children.

Because children have been deemed by the consensus of parents, who are voters, to lack possession of informed consent, and because parents in general don’t want their children having sex, there are laws against it. Basically, parents are speaking through the law that nobody is allowed to have sex with their children, even if the child says it’s ok. Note that if someone does, the children are not subject to criminal charges.

But when the child grows up to be an adult, they gain possession of informed consent. At this point, their legal guardianship transfers to themselves. At this point, they are expected to and legally recognized to bear responsibility for their actions. Nevertheless, people like yourself still insist on stepping in and acting as their parent, “for their own good”. They can have sex with whomever they want (risking disease, lack of “dignity,” breaking up other people’s marriages, etc, and all the other myriad harms of prostitution) so long as they do it without money changing hands. A dinner or a concert or a photo shoot is ok, and being a slut is legal. But the moment a dollar changes hands, people like yourself intercede and say no, you’ve crossed the line, we know better, that isn’t allowed. And unlike the case with children, now they are subject to criminal charges.

I can understand how throwing a pedophile in jail helps others. I can’t understand how throwing a willing prostitute in jail helps anyone, and especially not her, the one people like yourself are ostensibly “trying to help.” That’s a pretty brutal kind of help, sort of like Islam lite. (”We kill them to retain honor.”) You do know, don’t you, that jails are rife with rape, disease, violence, and reduction of dignity, don’t you? They should be reserved for those who harm others against their will, not those who pleasure others according to their will (and pocketbooks).


62 posted on 03/18/2008 6:36:02 AM PDT by coloradan (The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

STDs don’t know whether you’re merely promiscuous or actually a prostitute, but only prostitution is illegal. So, STDs are a red herring.


63 posted on 03/18/2008 6:51:38 AM PDT by coloradan (The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson