Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ccmay
Not disagreeing, but issuance of gun permits is an administrative decision, not a criminal sanction. A similar issue is guys who pleaded to indecent exposure for peeing on the sidewalk in 1974 and can't live within a mile of a school and have their pictures posted on the internet.
43 posted on 03/16/2008 9:09:55 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The women got the vote and the Nation got Harding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Not disagreeing, but issuance of gun permits is an administrative decision, not a criminal sanction.

The Lautenberg amendment bans "shipment, transport, ownership and use of guns or ammunition by individuals convicted of misdemeanor or felony domestic violence".

It has nothing to do with "issuance of gun permits".

It applies even in the civilized portions of the country where no permit is required for weapon ownership, as the unfortunate Dr. Emerson found out.

52 posted on 03/16/2008 9:23:10 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
You may need a permit to purchase a firearm in Massachussetts, but many other states have no such requirement. EIther you can or cannot own a firearm by federal law, and if you can, no permit is required, except for Class III or concealed carry, and in some states no CCW permit is required, either.

Telling someone they cannot own a firearm in such states over a misdemeanor is a criminal sanction, and not an administrative decision.

72 posted on 03/16/2008 10:28:06 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson