Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Is Clinton Hiding? (Obama Counterattack begins)
Chicago Tribune ^ | March 16, 2008 | staff

Posted on 03/17/2008 1:13:57 AM PDT by tlb

Hillary Clinton often seems to operate by the maxim that silence is golden. When asked whether she would release a list of her earmarks, her spokesman dodged the question, while declaring that she is "proud of the investments in New York that she has secured." But for now, at least, not proud enough to let voters know what they are.

This exercise in secrecy is part of a Clinton pattern that grows more worrisome all the time. The former first lady often says that she, unlike Obama, has been thoroughly vetted, rendering her impervious to Republican attacks. In fact, there are some important things unknown about her -- and her conduct suggests she wants to keep it that way. Which raises a question for voters: What is she hiding, and why?

There is, for example, the matter of the Clinton tax returns. Obama has released his, but she has stalled on following suit. (John McCain also has balked.) When asked about them in a February debate, she insisted she would make the returns public. But when asked if she would do so before the March 4 primaries, she replied, unconvincingly, "Well, I can't get it together by then, but I will certainly work to get it together. I'm a little busy right now; I hardly have time to sleep."

Disclosure might shed light on Bill Clinton's dealings with the likes of Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra. Giustra ..made a secret $31 million donation to Clinton's charitable foundation.

Bill Clinton has declined to disclose the donors to either his foundation or his presidential library, which makes it hard to know if wealthy individuals may be trying to curry favor with the woman who may be president -- and if so, who they are.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: chaos; clinton; demchaos; hillary; hillarysecrets; nobama; obama; stophillary
It was reported days ago Obama was going to begin negative attacks on Clinton's scandals. Finance and corruption is stage one, Bill's affairs I predict is stage two, then Hillary's.
1 posted on 03/17/2008 1:13:59 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tlb

Who would have thought that we would now be watching such a fun and festive RAT food fight... More popcorn please.


2 posted on 03/17/2008 1:22:23 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
He's going to have to do something - and the faster the better for him, especially considering how awful last week was for his campaign. Not to mention the fact that I think NewsMax is planning a very damning article on Obama within the next 24-72 hours (more about him and his pastor, apparently).
3 posted on 03/17/2008 1:24:35 AM PDT by jdm (Relax, it's just the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Who would have thought that we would now be watching such a fun and festive RAT food fight... More popcorn please.

And it's just the beginning too. Going to be a very interesting Spring/Summer.

4 posted on 03/17/2008 1:26:03 AM PDT by jdm (Relax, it's just the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Lots of Democrats reading NewsMax? ;)


5 posted on 03/17/2008 1:27:13 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jdm; AmericaUnited; tlb
And it's just the beginning too. Going to be a very interesting Spring/Summer.

At first I thougth you wrote "Springer Summer".

6 posted on 03/17/2008 1:31:25 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jdm; AmericaUnited; tlb
And it's just the beginning too. Going to be a very interesting Spring/Summer.

At first I thougth you wrote "Springer Summer".


7 posted on 03/17/2008 1:31:36 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Eventually, both are going to start blaming Rove.


8 posted on 03/17/2008 2:00:24 AM PDT by RouxStir (No Peeing Allowed in the Gene Pool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Let’s just hope he can do a better job of it than the Republicans did.

Secrecy, lies, misdirection, vicious slanderous counterattacks... these are all weapons the Clintons have used with the greatest effect time and time again.

Who fired the White House travel office staff?

How did those Rose Law firm billing records just magically appear on a table in the White House?

Cattle futures? FBI files? Whitewater?

Who hired Craig Livingstone?

Did we EVER get an answer to any one of those questions?

Wasn’t Bill Clinton the ONLY President in living memory who refused to release his medical records? And why was that?

It’s so totally obvious that there are so many things that the Clintons want to hide. And will continue to hide. They just always seem to get away with it.

I am sure that he has had a lot of people tell him the same thing in recent days, but Barrack damn well better be prepared to play total hardball here, because that’s the only way the Clintons ever play the game.


9 posted on 03/17/2008 2:17:47 AM PDT by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
I wonder if the Obama camp has discussed Juanita Broaddrick.

http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/1999/03/cov_03feature2.html

We believe you, Juanita (we think)

Susan Faludi, Susan Brownmiller, Katie Roiphe, Gloria Allred and others respond to Juanita Broaddrick's explosive charges.

BY CAMILLE PERI, FIONA MORGAN AND DAWN MacKEEN |

"I just couldn't hold it in any longer," Juanita Broaddrick told Lisa Myers in an interview that aired on "Dateline NBC" last week, explaining why she came forward after 21 years to allege that then-Arkansas Attorney General Bill Clinton had raped her. "I didn't want granddaughters and nieces when they're 21 years old to turn to me and say, "Why didn't you tell what this man did to you?"

-snip-

It was a touching moment and, according to a Fox News survey, a convincing one -- a remarkable 54 percent of the "scandal-weary" American public who watched the interview believed Broaddrick was telling the truth.

-snip-

Susan Brownmiller (author of "Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape"):

I think Juanita Broaddrick's story is credible. You judge a witness when you see them. I watched her on television and she struck me as telling an honest story.

-snip-

Susan Faludi (journalist and author of "Backlash: The Undeclared War against American Women"):

Juanita Broaddrick's story sounded credible to me, but I'm just somebody watching somebody speak on television. It's not a story that I've personally investigated, so to say that she's credible is just a gut reaction on my part. That said, I have no reason to disbelieve her.

-snip-

Gloria Allred (attorney -- filed a friend of the court brief in Jones' sexual harassment suit against Clinton):

I think Juanita Broaddrick appeared very credible on the interview on NBC.

I don't find it a problem that it occurred 20 years ago and it was in a hotel room -- just because it was in a hotel room doesn't mean that she couldn't have been a victim of sexual assault. Because she didn't report it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

-snip-

10 posted on 03/17/2008 2:27:33 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

What is Hildabeast hiding??? You have got to be kidding! Everything. These democrats are just too stupid to run 2 candidates with so much baggage.


11 posted on 03/17/2008 4:05:54 AM PDT by DooDahhhh (AMEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tlb

The title of the article pretty much says it all. What is Clinton hiding? Everything!


12 posted on 03/17/2008 5:33:03 AM PDT by ops33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

The Trib has always been an Obama backer, probably one of his most effective backers. Its big coup was getting a California judge to unseal his original Republican opponent’s “sealed and confidential” divorce records, thereby driving that Republican out of the race for the U.S. Senate.


13 posted on 03/17/2008 6:56:17 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Maybe not a lot, but definitely the Clintonoids who count and can get the MSM to repeat what Newsmax has reported.


14 posted on 03/17/2008 6:57:55 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Disclosure might shed light on Bill Clinton's dealings with the likes of Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra -- whom the former president accompanied on a 2005 trip to Kazakhstan. Giustra landed a major uranium mining deal on the trip, and not long after made a secret $31 million donation to Clinton's charitable foundation.

Hmmm...

15 posted on 03/17/2008 7:53:03 AM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("a wee bit silly." -Lord Trimble on Hillary Clinton's claim of foreign policy "experience".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson