To: ladyjane
I wonder if he mentions Pearl Harbor in his travels. Why should he? That was a legitimate attack on a military target.
71 posted on
03/17/2008 5:50:52 PM PDT by
jude24
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: jude24
Do you feel the bombing Hiroshima and Nagasacki was wrong?
79 posted on
03/17/2008 5:59:31 PM PDT by
ladyjane
To: jude24
Why should he? That was a legitimate attack on a military target. Where do you creeps come from anyway? More importantly, why?
84 posted on
03/17/2008 6:03:37 PM PDT by
bjs1779
To: jude24
Why should he? That [Pearl Harbor] was a legitimate attack on a military target.
It was also a sneak attack made while simultaneously conducting 'peace' negotiations. There was nothing 'legitimate' about the taking of thousands of American lives on December 7, 1941, and you know that.
85 posted on
03/17/2008 6:04:02 PM PDT by
mkjessup
(This year's presidential choices: "Speak No Evil, See No Evil, and Evil")
To: jude24
That was a legitimate attack on a military target. It was no more legitimate than an American attack on Tokyo would be today without a declaration of war.
In other words, NOT AT ALL.
95 posted on
03/17/2008 6:14:02 PM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson