Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bear Naked Lenders
WSJ ^ | 03/18/08

Posted on 03/17/2008 10:35:01 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Bear Naked Lenders

March 18, 2008

The best thing about Sunday night's Federal Reserve-inspired sale of Bear Stearns to J.P. Morgan Chase is the price. At $2 a share for a total of $236 million, this was less a "bailout" than a Fed-mediated liquidation sale. Bear wasn't too big to fail after all, though there's still the issue of the Fed expanding its own moral and financial hazard in the form of $30 billion in guarantees on Bear Stearns securities.

Bear shareholders will essentially be wiped out in this close-out sale, with British billionaire Joseph Lewis alone reportedly enduring paper losses of $800 million on his 9.6% stake. Even on Wall Street, that's real money. Jimmy Cayne, the Bear Chairman and former CEO who supervised this disaster, will lose a bundle on his nearly 5% holding. This makes the Bear sale different from the Fed-managed Long-Term Capital Management rescue of a decade ago, when investors were left substantially intact. We doubt many bankers will look at Bear's fate and claim there's no punishment for financial error.

Bear employees, who hold about one third of its shares, are angry and grousing that they could get more cents on the equity dollar in Chapter 11. Some may even be inclined to vote against the sale, but then they'd have to find a market for that $30 billion in mortgage securities that no one wants to finance.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bearstearns; fed; lender; wallstreet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 03/17/2008 10:35:01 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Uncle Ike; RSmithOpt; jiggyboy; 2banana; Travis McGee; OwenKellogg; 31R1O; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 03/17/2008 10:35:30 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

What is the old saying? You won’t see who is naked until the tide goes out? Well, I say its heading toward old tide soon.


3 posted on 03/17/2008 10:37:50 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If I knew the Fed would give me $250 million to buy Bear, I’d have applied for the deal!


4 posted on 03/17/2008 10:44:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (http://www.fourfriedchickensandacoke.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Then skim $5 million and run. Don't be greedy and run off with the entire $250 million.:-)
5 posted on 03/17/2008 10:48:35 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Anyone in need of some office space in mid-town Manhattan? 1,200,000 sq feet of it just came on the market.


6 posted on 03/17/2008 10:50:34 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

It looks as though it would be too cold to sleep there at night. I pass.:-)


7 posted on 03/17/2008 10:52:56 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

It seems ridiculous that JPMorgan will get their hands on his building for a fraction of what it’s worth.

Corporate Welfare.


8 posted on 03/17/2008 11:00:56 PM PDT by RegT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yeah well, the estimated legal fees alone to handle the whole mess, clock it at $6 billion.

Still Morgan got a deal. Their stock is up almost $10 billion on the news - the market's best guess as to what Bear will really be worth, shorn of its financial distress.

9 posted on 03/17/2008 11:48:34 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RegT
The building? Give me a break. They are assuming $385 billion in debts. Bear had $395 billion in assets as of the end of last year. The risk involved is at least $30 billion on the asset side off that gigantic see-saw might be only worth $20 billion.
10 posted on 03/17/2008 11:51:01 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Bear shareholders will essentially be wiped out in this close-out sale,

Yeah, but the executive suite doesn't have to give back the billions in "performance bonuses" that they pocketed. They would have had to if bankruptcy were declared.

11 posted on 03/18/2008 12:31:51 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
"the billions in "performance bonuses""

Usually paid in company stock not immediately vested.

yitbos

12 posted on 03/18/2008 12:59:54 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
The risk involved is at least $30 billion on the asset side off that gigantic see-saw might be only worth $20 billion.

So do the math:$20 billion downside $30 billion Fed backstop guarantee = $10 billion uptick yesterday for JPM.

I believe with aggressive work they'll be able to do better with the chaff than Bear did so their gain might be even larger.

If not and it's larger than the $30 billion then the Bear will eat them in about a month. (Or Bailout Ben will show up with another bag of our money)

13 posted on 03/18/2008 2:11:14 AM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Its still too early to say what Cayne and the other insiders lost yet. I’ll bet there was some payment of some kind in the agreement. Even if they lost everything Cayne and company had been milking the company for years. Cayne if I remember correctly sold some stock last year while it was up.


14 posted on 03/18/2008 2:35:23 AM PDT by Racer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Give it a year or two and JP Morgan Chase will realize a huge gain on the orderly liquidation of thos mortgage backed securities. The average life of a residential mortgage is still under ten years with home sales and refinances paying out most of this paper.


15 posted on 03/18/2008 3:41:11 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
My guess is that JPM/Chase will come home a very big winner on this. After all, they bought a temporarily illiquid securities portfolio that is backed by performing loans (for the most part). I thinkthat over the next thre to five years they will have some big paydays.

Old J. Pierpont Morgan is smiling somewhere.

16 posted on 03/18/2008 3:45:01 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
(Or Bailout Ben will show up with another bag of our money)

The Fed doesn't receive appropriations from Congress. It's the Fed itself that is on the hook.

17 posted on 03/18/2008 3:53:04 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine
My guess is that JPM/Chase will come home a very big winner on this. After all, they bought a temporarily illiquid securities portfolio that is backed by performing loans (for the most part). I thinkthat over the next thre to five years they will have some big paydays.

I think you're right and that means the Fed mad a good move too.

18 posted on 03/18/2008 3:56:26 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; All

Inflation Blues sung by B.B. King

Hey Mr. President
All your congressmen, too
You got me frustrated
And I don’t know what to do
I’m trying to make a living
I can’t save a cent
It takes all of my money
Just to eat and pay my rent
I got the blues
Got those inflation blues

You know, I’m not one
Of those high brows
I’m average Joe to you
I came up eating cornbread
Candied yams and chicken stew
Now you take that paper dollar
It’s only that in name
The way that buck has shrunk
It’s a lowdown dirty shame
That’s why I got the blues
Got those inflation blues

Mr. President
Please cut the price of sugar
I wanna make my coffee sweet
I wanna smear some butter on my bread
And I just got to have my meat
When you start rationing
You really played the game
And things are going up
And up and up and up
And my check remains the same
That’s why I got the blues
Got those inflation blues


19 posted on 03/18/2008 4:41:27 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (http://www.fourfriedchickensandacoke.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Meantime, he gets the Fed to backstop Bear's riskiest paper. We don't know the quality of that paper -- and we hope the Fed has done its due diligence -- but taxpayers are now on the hook for future losses.

Straw man. Incredibly, or maybe not incredibly, they use this token amount as an excuse to lower rates more. They will be the last people on the planet to admit that lower rates are the problem, not the solution. If the Fed has to pour in 100 billion or a trillion to keep the financial system from unraveling, then they should do so. But they must stop lowering rates, that will only result in risky securities, speculation and bigger problems later.

Mises was right, either we pay for this mess now with taxpayer cash and recession, or we destroy the currency. There are no other choices.

20 posted on 03/18/2008 4:47:36 AM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson