Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cell Picture Of Undercover Officer Sparks Arrest
Tampa Bay Online ^ | March 16, 2008 | Michael A. Scarcella

Posted on 03/18/2008 8:27:25 AM PDT by Lester Moore

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Lester Moore

And if the masked secret police with their secret vehicles conduct a raid near an ATM machine, do they damand that the bank hand over the files or else?

How about the various street webcams that are all over?


21 posted on 03/18/2008 9:05:05 AM PDT by Ender Wiggin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

He was held on a probation violation, not on the merits of this arrest


22 posted on 03/18/2008 9:05:18 AM PDT by Starwolf (I rode to work today, did you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“It seems there is a difference of opinion between the defense and prosecution on the applicable law and the judge is siding with the prosecution.”

Perhaps the judge is protecting Seivert from a blue accident?


23 posted on 03/18/2008 9:05:50 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Truthism Watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lester Moore

If the police do not want undercover vehicles identified, they should not bring the cars and trucks when they execute search warrants.

This makes sense to me.


24 posted on 03/18/2008 9:06:32 AM PDT by proudpapa (May God Bless Our Troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Like a Newspaper? Would the cops have the paper go around and collect every paper sold? Ah, jeez and then there’s the internet. Okay, everyone erase their HDD’s.


25 posted on 03/18/2008 9:06:38 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lester Moore

Don’t Pic me bro.


26 posted on 03/18/2008 9:07:59 AM PDT by Mark was here (The earth is bipolar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought

Ridiculous post of the day. what side are you on?


27 posted on 03/18/2008 9:09:42 AM PDT by RDTF (Go AEGIS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

Smile when you say that.

28 posted on 03/18/2008 9:10:01 AM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (Accept the challenges so that you can feel the exhilaration of victory. - George Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VietVet

Your being uncomfortable has no bearing on the legality of someone snapping a candid picture.

When in public view privacy fades.

Has anyone considered that the cell phone user may have already known these “undercover” cops?


29 posted on 03/18/2008 9:10:39 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Starwolf
He was held on a probation violation, not on the merits of this arrest

What was the probation violation?

30 posted on 03/18/2008 9:10:42 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lester Moore
It is evident to even those unmoved by conspiracy theories that the War on Drugs and the epidemic of crime from gangs and illegal immigration (curiously unchecked by our politicians) are providing the convenient excuse for the emergence of a police state.
31 posted on 03/18/2008 9:12:08 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

I don’t really like the idea of armed men wearing masks pulling up in unmarked cars and kicking in doors over an ounce of weed. The police budget shouldn’t rely on confiscated assets either. This is what leads to corruption.


32 posted on 03/18/2008 9:15:18 AM PDT by peeps36 (OUTLAWED WORDS--INSURGENT,GLOBAL WARMING,UNDOCUMENTED WORKER,PALESTINIAN,TERMINATED PREGNANCY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

The people. Come join us.


33 posted on 03/18/2008 9:16:57 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Truthism Watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: starlifter

He dissed their tacticoolness.


34 posted on 03/18/2008 9:17:42 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Where are they hiding Obama’s white half?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson

perfect movie warrior image.

It freaks me when they load themselves up with multiple throwaway weapons. I guess this ninja will empty the single Uzi magazine and discard the Uzi, and then use up his pistols and then end up with his ultimate weapon, the sword.


35 posted on 03/18/2008 9:18:22 AM PDT by ansel12 (Ronald W. Reagan and William F. Buckley Jr., both were U.S. Army veterans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lester Moore

These cops are totally out of line. What law, if any, that gives them the authority to have anyone erase pictures would be unConstitutional. Badges and guns do not make these guys right and just because the person taking their pictures has a prior record does not make him wrong.


36 posted on 03/18/2008 9:24:27 AM PDT by PeterFinn (I am not voting for McCain. No way, no how.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lester Moore

Undercover vehicle

The actual photo in question

37 posted on 03/18/2008 9:28:55 AM PDT by DCBurgess58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson

I’ve always wondered why Snake Eyes went with the Venetian blinds-style visor — seems a bit impractical.


38 posted on 03/18/2008 9:30:22 AM PDT by Polonius (It's called logic, it'll help you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Starwolf
"He was held on a probation violation, not on the merits of this arrest"

Does the term "circular logic" mean anything to you. He was being held on a probation violation which was the bogus arrest based on taking the photograph. If the underlying reason for being arrested is bogus, then there would have been no probation violation in the first place.

39 posted on 03/18/2008 9:33:41 AM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: VietVet
For a criminal (he had a record) with prior involvement with drugs to be on the scene of a raid by narcotics detectives, taking pictures, leads to the reasonable suspicion that the pictures were intended to be used to “blow the cover” of the undercover officers, which would have endangered their lives.

All that stuff may sound compelling, but it isn't germane to this case. The plain fact of the matter is that a person has every right to photograph whatever is happening in public. Period. It doesn't matter who that person is, why that person is there, etc. If the thing is going down in public, it has no reasonable expectation of privacy, and a person with a camera can snap away until the cows come home.

40 posted on 03/18/2008 9:40:46 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson