Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Appointing conservative judges would undermine the maverick’s legislative legacy.
1 posted on 03/18/2008 9:12:54 AM PDT by paleorite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: paleorite

I keep asking the question, when schumer and the democrats filibuster the next conservative nominee to the supreme court, will McCain shut down the government if they refuse to give his nominee and up or down vote? Anything less will mean another souter or a kennedy to the court. My gut tells me McCain will cave in and appoint a liberal to the court.


2 posted on 03/18/2008 9:15:53 AM PDT by mainerforglobalwarming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paleorite

Not fair. Quit looking at what the man has done, listen and believe what he says. /s


4 posted on 03/18/2008 9:19:55 AM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paleorite
McCain, faced with a Democratic Congress, could use judicial appointments as a bargaining chip to achieve policy compromises.”

That is frightening and actually I never thought about this but this could be true.

5 posted on 03/18/2008 9:21:48 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paleorite
McCain answered, “Well, certainly Roberts,”

With McCain we have a chance of another Roberts, even if not another Alito. With Clinton or Obama we have the certainty of abominations appointed to the Supreme Court. We'd be lucky to get Laurence Tribe.

8 posted on 03/18/2008 9:28:30 AM PDT by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paleorite

If McCain had some kind of record for keeping his word or standing by his party, this might have a little credibility.

But as it is, he has zero credibility. He would “reach out” to Teddy Kennedy & Co. in a nanosecond.


13 posted on 03/18/2008 10:22:51 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paleorite
"Appointing conservative judges would undermine the maverick’s legislative legacy."

Actually, it would undermine Soros', McCain's puppetmaster's agenda.

14 posted on 03/18/2008 10:30:17 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paleorite

McCain is most certainly going to nominate better judges than either Hillary or Barak would.


16 posted on 03/18/2008 10:56:41 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paleorite
The article by Michael Dougherty completely overlooks major constitutional problems with Roe v. Wade anyway. In fact, this post (<-click) tells how FDR's constitutionally unauthorized New Deal programs arguably let to the USSC's scandalous legalization of abortion. Note that the post first references two non-abortion cases in order to show Roe v. Wade in a different, troubling perspective.

And speaking of FDR, the concern about nominating the wrong people to the Supreme Court hauntingly reflects on FDR's unpopular plan to stack the Court.

17 posted on 03/18/2008 11:09:42 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson