Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

G-rated films power 2007 box office, again Family films fare 438% better than R-rated in new study
World Net Daily ^ | March 14, 2008

Posted on 03/18/2008 10:27:51 AM PDT by Between the Lines

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: discostu
They also get that there are 300 million other people in the country, and some of them don’t want to see G-rated movies.

Such people are idiots. Anyone with intelligence and a love for film enjoys seeing anything excellent, regardless of its rating.

21 posted on 03/18/2008 10:51:10 AM PDT by Chunga (Vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Silliness (on WND’s part). There are probably far more “R” movies than “G” with many being small arthouse indie releases that pull down the average revenue. Compare the top five “G”’s with the top 5 “R”’s and see what you get.


22 posted on 03/18/2008 10:51:10 AM PDT by jjm2111 (Are we going to have a Daily Dose of McCain?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I think a lot of Hollywood producers were wieners in school and couldn't get a girlfriend. To make up for this lack of sex appeal, they produce movies where they can watch women undress and have sex to fulfill their fantasies.

I only think this because I graduated with a kid who is now a “producer”. He is how I described above. It's easier to create a fantasy than to deal with reality.

23 posted on 03/18/2008 10:51:31 AM PDT by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: discostu

That’s why boycotts never work.


24 posted on 03/18/2008 10:51:34 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Men fight well when they know that no prisoners will be taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Just saw “National Treasure: Book of Secrets”

Fun movie.


25 posted on 03/18/2008 10:52:54 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

They aren’t idiots, they have their taste in movies. A lot of G-rated movies stink, recently the quality has gone up but I grew up in the time when G-rated meant Apple Dumpling Gang and other simply atrocious Disney (and others, but usually Disney) movies. It took a few really great movies like Toy Story to retrain my instinct, and even then there’s still some pretty serious crud that comes out in G, stuff with talking animals.


26 posted on 03/18/2008 10:55:31 AM PDT by discostu (aliens ate my Buick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: outinyellowdogcountry

I went with a bunch of friends to see 300. Of the group, two (including me) were vets. Myself and the other vet hated the movie and everyone else loved it.


27 posted on 03/18/2008 10:56:29 AM PDT by jjm2111 (Are we going to have a Daily Dose of McCain?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Boycotts of the movie industry have problems because it’s a huge industry. Nearly $10 billion domestically at the box office last year, hard to put a serious dent in that.


28 posted on 03/18/2008 10:56:47 AM PDT by discostu (aliens ate my Buick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

However, if the “family” films are about hip hop culture or are filled with poopy-farty jokes, we don’t want to take our kids to those, either.


29 posted on 03/18/2008 10:57:28 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
I went with a bunch of friends to see 300. Of the group, two (including me) were vets. Myself and the other vet hated the movie and everyone else loved it.

I don't go see movies myself, but I've heard that 300 got rave reviews. Why did you vets not like it? Too radically different of a style of warfare?

30 posted on 03/18/2008 11:03:00 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Men fight well when they know that no prisoners will be taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: No Fool

ping


31 posted on 03/18/2008 11:03:58 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right! (Dear RNC: Not one Conservative Candidate? Not one "RED" penny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

Rather be dipped in acid then watch brain-dead films.... I like my Die Hard, Lethal Weapon, Sin City, etc. movies....


32 posted on 03/18/2008 11:04:52 AM PDT by thebaron512
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

I am not buying any of this.
1- huge accounting problems
a- foreign distribution is not included
b-dvd sells are not included.
c-costs are not included.
2-Markets are efficient- why hasn’t some buy bought a film studio fore the purpose of producing high rated g films?
there is no entry problem. Anyone can make and distrubte films.
3- theaters just want more customers and will put anything in the theaters.


33 posted on 03/18/2008 11:08:33 AM PDT by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Mr. Bean’s Holiday: Rated G in DVD. It is a riot for all ages. Very clean. Very silly. Family entertainment.


34 posted on 03/18/2008 11:08:44 AM PDT by Notwithstanding ("You are either with America in our time of need or you are not" - W? No, 'twas Sen. Hillary 9/12/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Transformers and Spiderman 3 were not G-rated, they were PG-13.
I hated Spiderman 3 because the characters were slef absorbed crybabies,
I loved Transformers for its positove message and attitude towards our military.
“No sacrifice, no victory.”
They didn’t humanize the villian, it was classic good guy vs bad guy.


35 posted on 03/18/2008 11:08:47 AM PDT by Larebil (My name is liberal backwards, since they backwards thinking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: discostu
They aren’t idiots, they have their taste in movies.

Only an idiot would despise excellence in film, regardless of rating.

36 posted on 03/18/2008 11:10:19 AM PDT by Chunga (Vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

Maybe you should read past the first sentence.


37 posted on 03/18/2008 11:11:24 AM PDT by discostu (aliens ate my Buick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Larebil

They’re going to ruin GI Joe.


38 posted on 03/18/2008 11:12:46 AM PDT by Clemenza (I Live in New Jersey for the Same Reason People Slow Down to Look at Car Crashes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
There are probably far more “R” movies than “G” with many being small arthouse indie releases that pull down the average revenue. Compare the top five “G”’s with the top 5 “R”’s and see what you get.

The article is comparing dollars to dollars. The fact that more R movies were made yet they grossed less shows that the R rated movies are not as good as an investment.

39 posted on 03/18/2008 11:19:39 AM PDT by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative
Bad analogy...R-rated films are only intended for a specific audience thus will make less money,

Shrek, Alvin and the Chipmunks and Ratatouille were intended for a specific audience also.

40 posted on 03/18/2008 11:20:05 AM PDT by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson