Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BellPlantation

I am very glad to hear it. I wonder if the process is usable for all the biomass that we normally put in our landfills. I guess that the sorting of it might be too costly.

I am not asking secrets, I believe, when I ask if the process converts cellulose?

Have you been able to come up with any production figures, or is “biomass” so differentiated that production per pound of dry biomass is a nonsensical term?


124 posted on 03/19/2008 7:37:59 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Our process is based on naturally occuring bacteria that have been genetically modified to each faster and to eat a broader range of biomass. We can use all forms of biomass, if it breaks down in nature, our bacteria can break it down and convert it into hydrocarbon. We can get between 2 and 2.t barrels of hydrocarbon per ton of biomass.


128 posted on 03/19/2008 7:49:47 AM PDT by BellPlantation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

We are able to breakdown cellulose, lignon, hemicellolose and xylan at this time. Yes, we are working with landfills to mine landfills in the future, but at this time we are concentrating on using new biomass that is currently being grown. We want to slow the flow into landfills.


129 posted on 03/19/2008 7:49:47 AM PDT by BellPlantation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

We can use all forms of biomass. We should be able to produce 2 to 2.5 barrels of hydrocarbon per ton of biomass.


130 posted on 03/19/2008 7:49:56 AM PDT by BellPlantation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson