Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rellimpank
But he also gave America the Sedition Act of 1798, which made it a crime to criticize the federal government or its officers. A revolutionary who betrays his ideals has little right to complain about his treatment by history.

True enough.

9 posted on 03/19/2008 6:18:32 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Virginia Ridgerunner
True enough.

Actually, not true at all.

The Sedition Act did not criminalize criticism of the Federal government.

What it did was effectively criminalize libel against the Federal government - as if the Federal government was a individual who could be injured by libelous publications.

It wasn't a good law and Jefferson was right in allowing it to expire - but don't let's pretend that it was something different than it was.

24 posted on 03/19/2008 6:43:47 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

From what I’ve read Adams merely signed that law but was not the man behind it.

I’ve also read that Adams was NOT a political animal (as another poster stated earlier) and that was one of his difficulties in dealing with others. I believe he also inherited a cabinet and was not ready for the political games that were played and he had no initial objection to the composition of that cabinet.


90 posted on 03/22/2008 6:20:33 PM PDT by Skywalk (Transdimensional Jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson