Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Refiners May Cut Gasoline Output on Weak Profit(Weak Profit? Huh?)
Reuters ^ | Mar 19, 2008 8:26pm GMT | Rebekah Kebede

Posted on 03/20/2008 10:23:35 PM PDT by kellynla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
"Still not the worst business to be in."

No Shiite!LOL

1 posted on 03/20/2008 10:23:35 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Add 50 cents/gal tax— that will solve everything.


2 posted on 03/20/2008 10:30:13 PM PDT by Mark (REMEMBER: Mean spirited, angry remarks against my postings won't feed even one hungry child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"U.S. refiners may be forced to deepen gasoline production cuts at a time of year they normally maximize output"

Well Hillary and Nobama, here ya are! A nice fat juicy campaign issue to prove that the people are being gouged. And for that matter, Pelosi and Waxman can start hearings tomorrow! Happy happy joy joy.

3 posted on 03/20/2008 10:32:41 PM PDT by Enterprise ((Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Is this April 1st ???


4 posted on 03/20/2008 10:32:55 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Not counting road taxes, the state of CA collects $0.25 to $0.28 per gallon in sales taxes for which all they have to do is collect it.

They don’t have to rfine it, sell it, store or transport it. Talk about windfall!


5 posted on 03/20/2008 10:49:37 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The refineries have to pay high prices for oil to refine. It makes no sense for refineries to pay high prices for oil only to build inventory at a time when demand is softening. Buy curtailing production they will also decrease the demand for oil and help drive oil prices down. Refinery margins are very thin and they make money not from the price of oil or gas, but from volume on the difference between the two.

All of this is a good sign. It means we are buying less gas, which is the only way prices are going to eventually come down.

This is just the free market working.


6 posted on 03/20/2008 10:51:26 PM PDT by KingKenrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
It must come as a complete shock to you people that crude oil is an input (i.e., a cost) to a refinery.
7 posted on 03/20/2008 10:53:37 PM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

WTF?


8 posted on 03/20/2008 10:54:00 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff

If crude is a cost and their margins are DOWN, they must not be raising their prices as fast as OPEC. How EEEEEVVIIIILLLL.


9 posted on 03/20/2008 11:03:03 PM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Short crude.


10 posted on 03/20/2008 11:04:47 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingKenrod

Good, cogent common sense. Well expressed. Thanks!


11 posted on 03/20/2008 11:09:56 PM PDT by JennysCool (They all say they want change, but they’re really after folding money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Somewhere along the line the oil companys are still making there billions in profit. You can bet on it.

“NEW YORK (Reuters) — Exxon Mobil Corp. posted the largest annual profit in U.S. history Thursday, even though fourth-quarter earnings fell on lower natural gas prices and shrinking gasoline margins.

For the year, Exxon Mobil earned $39.5 billion, up from its previous record $36.1 billion in 2005.”

February 1 2007

http://money.cnn.com/2007/02/01/news/companies/exxonmobil/index.htm


12 posted on 03/20/2008 11:18:25 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Have the Fed build refineries.

Just as we own airports,stadiums and hospitals for the public good.


13 posted on 03/20/2008 11:22:09 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Duncan Hunter- The very Govts unwilling to support us in the WOT got the Fuel Tanker Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The fact is that gasoline demand is relatively inelastic, to a point. But when you are paying $150 to fill up the suburban, or $100 to fill up the old pickup, eventually you will see a decrease in demand. This has happened much slower because after the 70’s oil “shortages” fleet mpg averages went way higher. Therefore, even after oil broke 2 bucks, people were still paying much less of their inflation adjusted income to fillup. Even now, I remember my Pontiac Catalina got about 8-10 mpg. I was filling that car up every 200 miles. Now a similar car will get close to 20 mpg on the highway. Therefore it is using half the number of gallons to go the same mileage. So when gas was a buck a gallon you paid 20 bucks to go 200 miles. Now that its 3-4 bucks you are paying 30-40 bucks to go 200 miles. However from the 70’s to now, the dollar is probably worth .25 to .33 what it was then. So inflation and mileage adjusted you are still paying less, unless of course you own a Jeep grand cherokee which gets 13mpg. Still more than the equivalent car from the early 70’s.

The other factor is that our leaders, especially that moron Carter stoked the fears of the public and caused a massive cut in driving and the economy. Who else out there remembers odd-even rationing and gasless Sundays. I remember driving during the second energy crisis on a Sunday and seeing the empty highways. The country virtually shutdown on Sundays. This was really good for the restaurant business.

Now, there is a built in tolerance and acceptance of commodity gyrations in the psyche of the American public. They just don’t get as rattled as they once did. Obviously what we are seeing here is a decrease in driving, perhaps as much as 10 percent. This reverberates throughout the entire distribution system. Can you spell oil price krash?

Another theory, and just a theory, what if Iran and Venezuela and perhaps several other countries, to wreak a little economic havoc, sold dollars short, bought oil long, bought Euros long and did this in enormous quantities. This play for the past three years has been a winner for everyone. The number of oil futures contracts on the markets has expanded exponentially during the past three years, about 64 times according to one estimate. Consumption, worldwide peaked in 2006 and has been decreasing. This is purely a result of decrease in consumption. The demand in India and other developing countries is much more elastic than in developed countries.

So now, we have these rogue countries, economically attacking us and driving oil to $110 bucks, even in the face of decreasing demand. But all of a sudden, humongous sales of oil and purchases of dollars take place, oops, there could be several countries that find themselves in bankruptcy very quickly. Just a theory that bears watching.


14 posted on 03/20/2008 11:45:45 PM PDT by appeal2 (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff
It must come as a complete shock to you people that crude oil is an input (i.e., a cost) to a refinery.

One of the Cost of Goods Sold. Accounting 101. Costs go up... margins go down. So simple, even a liberal should understand.

15 posted on 03/21/2008 12:11:34 AM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: appeal2

I remember the Carter gas lines. So does my brother. He was so pissed off that he put a 1,000 undergraound gasoline tank next to his garage. Almost 30 years later, he calls a distributor and has it filled up. The only time he goes into a gas station is on long trips when he can’t fuel up at home.


16 posted on 03/21/2008 12:17:24 AM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I don’t think the feds build stadiums and airports. And the hospitals they build, well, I wouldn’t want to be in a VA Hospital.

Private ownership and competition is better.


17 posted on 03/21/2008 12:18:26 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
U.S. Refiners May Cut Gasoline Output on Weak Profit(Weak Profit? Huh?)
18 posted on 03/21/2008 1:53:36 AM PDT by OeOeO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel
Banks operate on a higher profit margin.

Maybe Hill & BHO can propose a 50 cent ATM transaction tax.

19 posted on 03/21/2008 3:22:07 AM PDT by PeteB570 (NRA - Life member and Black Rifle owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: umgud
Talk about windfall!

I prefer to call it "price gouging".....

20 posted on 03/21/2008 5:03:09 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Silence is not always a Sign of Wisdom, but Babbling is ever a Mark of Folly. - B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson