Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

You misread my post. His data IS about the old bath house culture. He’s a bigot because he has a clip-board of data about Gays that is a generation out of date that he pastes onto threads like these. Gays had a higher rate of alcoholism and suicide 20 years ago because they had no legal protection and were closeted and subject to being terminated or denied visitation to their children, or beaten up. His statistics about number of partners also reflect a pre-AIDS lifestyle that has changed as well. Most Gays want stable monogamous relationships like everyone else.


337 posted on 03/25/2008 9:05:22 AM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]


To: ffusco

I guess that explains your animosity.


339 posted on 03/25/2008 9:07:02 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

To: ffusco
Most Gays want stable monogamous relationships like everyone else.

Uh-huh.
342 posted on 03/25/2008 9:22:38 AM PDT by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

To: ffusco; panaxanax; trisham

What a bunch of crap.

Twenty years ago, gays had all the rights of any other legal citizen in this country. What they didn’t have was special rights like now, which they shouldn’t have.

The mantra of gays is that what’s done in the privacy of their own bedrooms is nobody else’s business, and I couldn’t agree more. Keep it there.

Don’t go telling me how it’s none of my business and then go announcing to the whole world what you’re doing. I’m not interested. If gays didn’t go around announcing their disgusting lifestyle to everyone else and trying to force others to accept the abnormal as normal, they wouldn’t get any backlash.

If gays are going to be in your face about their lifestyle, I’m going to be in theirs and tell them I don’t like it and don’t want to hear about it and they shouldn’t get protected citizen class.

Nor do I believe that the majority of them are interested in long term monogamous relationships. That option has always been available to them. If they wanted to stay together they could without a marriage ceremony, it’s their choice. If they wanted their partner to inherit their stuff when they died, that’s what wills can be used for.

They’re the ones making the issue of it. If they’d just drop the political PC crap agenda, they’d find life a lot more tolerable. Nobody would pick on them for what they didn’t know about.


344 posted on 03/25/2008 7:26:42 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson