Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fed's rescue halted a derivatives Chernobyl
Telegraph (UK) ^ | 11:33pm GMT 23/03/2008 | Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Posted on 03/23/2008 5:49:23 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-144 next last
To: iThinkBig

“Do this and we will quickly get out of depression and create millions of jobs through innovation. Don’t do it and expect severe depression and another global war.”

Happy thoughts for 1 am on Easter Monday. But, JPMChase bought its rival for a song. Now to squeeze the workers into juice.


81 posted on 03/23/2008 9:45:28 PM PDT by combat_boots (She lives! 22 weeks, 9.5 inches. Go, baby, go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
What does the PRC have in US treasuries futures now? $1+trillion?

According to this , $492.6 billion.

82 posted on 03/23/2008 9:52:17 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (NAFTA opponents are an odd coalition of the no-deodorant Left and the toothless-and-tinfoil right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

OK. Thanks for talking me down. I was getting worked up there.


83 posted on 03/23/2008 9:56:17 PM PDT by combat_boots (She lives! 22 weeks, 9.5 inches. Go, baby, go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: lainie

How about this tongue twister:

The Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund.

And of course, it failed!

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_43/b4055001.htm


84 posted on 03/23/2008 10:37:20 PM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Vince Ferrer

Thanks for the links!


85 posted on 03/23/2008 10:47:09 PM PDT by lainie ("You had your time, you had the power, you've yet to have your finest hour" (Roger Taylor, 1984))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Jim Rogers, whose earned million$ trading commodities, also says ....

Money Manager Says No to U.S. Stocks

86 posted on 03/23/2008 11:25:33 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not 'free'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; montag813

That effer Greenspan allowed and approved the explosive growth in derivatives and CMOs and other garbage. Whoever call Greenspan a closet gold advocate is an idiot.....

Though I would not be surprised if he owns lots of AU as a hedge against his moronic policies

Same as Arnold Schwarzenegger -— No way does he manage his money —200 million— recklessly. He saves that for the state of California


87 posted on 03/24/2008 3:58:12 AM PDT by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! <<<||>>> Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Donna Giorno
Full disclosure of all liabilities and marking these liabilities to market would do a lot to clear up the markets uncertainties.

Unfortunately, "mark to market" = "what people are willing to pay."

In times of uncertainty like this, the "market value" may be unfairly low (whatever that means); and the greater the pressure to do it, the lower the price is likely to go.

And then, once *anyone* sells at a low price, *everyone* will have their portfolios similarly valued; with the result that everyone will probably face margin calls at the same time, with the result that *everything* goes on a downward spiral at once. This would unwind the excesses all at once. BUT, that can't happen, because so many people are *highly* leveraged, based on the prior assumptios (during the bubble) of monotonically increasing prices, i.e. near zero risk. So even a relatively minor change in the prices downwards will drive many players to bankruptcy at the same time.

Cheers!

88 posted on 03/24/2008 4:07:18 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

And I can just about bet the farm that $10 trillion of the $13.4 is BS funny money just created out of thin air and put on paper.


89 posted on 03/24/2008 4:23:18 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998
Not only that, the good ol' USofA is in debt up to its eyeballs to the tune of $9.5 trillion and constantly running trade deficits. And now the Feds want the federal government to purchase mortgaged-back paper that is worthless?

WTF?

So, who has the money now? And they want the US taxpayer to foot the bill? Give me a break!!!

90 posted on 03/24/2008 4:33:20 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

I’m not speaking of derivative accounts. I’m speaking of normal stock/commodity investment accounts.


91 posted on 03/24/2008 4:49:35 AM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Do you understand what notional value is?


92 posted on 03/24/2008 6:26:58 AM PDT by groanup (Market bottom? Don't pick bottoms. Only monkeys pick bottoms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
What happens when one of the counterparties is insolvent, and can't pay?

Do you understand what "notional value" refers to?

93 posted on 03/24/2008 6:28:07 AM PDT by groanup (Market bottom? Don't pick bottoms. Only monkeys pick bottoms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Your memory is failing you.


94 posted on 03/24/2008 6:37:09 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Your nerve is failing you. Take your time. Find the real answer that shows my answer was bullshit. Post it here. Or run away. LOL!
95 posted on 03/24/2008 7:06:54 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (NAFTA opponents are an odd coalition of the no-deodorant Left and the toothless-and-tinfoil right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Read At Home Tonight BUMP!


96 posted on 03/24/2008 7:33:18 AM PDT by Pagey (Horrible Hillary Clinton is Bad For America, Bad For Business and Bad For MY Stomach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again.

You disagree with Jim Sinclair (post #35) where he states:

When an OTC derivative fails to perform, notional value becomes real value.

How is he wrong?

Your answer could read: "Yes, Jim Sinclair is wrong, because notional value is actually ...."

97 posted on 03/24/2008 8:15:36 AM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
When an OTC derivative fails to perform, notional value becomes real value.

How is he wrong?

Here is an old explanation I posted about interest rate swaps, the most common type of derivative.

Say you loaned out $1,000,000 at an adjustable rate, say 3 month Libor plus 2 points. Now want a fixed interest payment every month to meet some of your own obligations. You go to another bank that is willing to pay you 5% fixed for the next 3 years in exchange for your adjustable payment.

On the last day of each month you take the 3 month Libor rate and add 2 points. If the number is above 5%, you owe the bank. If the number is below 5%, the bank owes you.

Say Libor hits 4% and stays there for the entire 3 year term of your swap. Every month you owe the bank 1% on the $1,000,000 swap. That's $10,000 a year. Every month you wire the bank $833.33, but you have a swap for $1,000,000 and the bank has a swap for $1,000,000.

$2,000,000 in swaps! OMG!!! And every month $833.33 changes hands.

Now, if this "OTC derivative fails to perform" (that's a stupid phrase, maybe, "If the counterparty stops paying"?), they aren't sending me $833.33 each month.

How does that make the $2,000,000 in notional value real? I'm losing $10,000 in payments a year, for 3 years. I don't suddenly owe $2,000,000. No one suddenly owes me $2,000,000.

Do you know what notional means?

98 posted on 03/24/2008 8:22:57 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (NAFTA opponents are an odd coalition of the no-deodorant Left and the toothless-and-tinfoil right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: groanup; dennisw; AndyJackson
Do you honestly believe that these hedge funds are just playing paddycake with monopoly money, for their amusement, that when counterparties can't pay, the contracts just disappear and everybody has a laugh and goes to lunch?

Do you honestly believe this?

Is this why the Bear Stearns debacle occurred, because of purely imaginary notional funny money? Is this why Bernanke and Paulson are sweating bullets?

Do you honestly believe this?

99 posted on 03/24/2008 8:43:22 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Now, if this "OTC derivative fails to perform" (that's a stupid phrase, maybe, "If the counterparty stops paying"?), they aren't sending me $833.33 each month.

How does that make the $2,000,000 in notional value real? I'm losing $10,000 in payments a year, for 3 years. I don't suddenly owe $2,000,000. No one suddenly owes me $2,000,000.

I am familiar with loans which provide that, if several payments are missed, the entire loan balance is due at once. Now you did not explain whether any principal is being paid on the loan or not (is it an interest-only loan?).

If both loans have a provision that the remaining balance is due if three payments are missed, and the debtor on your loan defaults, and as a result you default on your loan from the bank, then it would be appropriate for both your balance sheet and the bank's balance sheet to show a loan default in the amount of whatever the balance of the loan would happen to be.

Presumably, your balance sheet would also identify your status of being in default of the loan from the bank.

100 posted on 03/24/2008 8:44:01 AM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson