Posted on 03/24/2008 2:42:18 PM PDT by SkyPilot
The parties could appoint someone else to run as their nominee. The election would still happen.
Yep, the dems are in a bad state. Still, we can’t coount on them to self-destruct. I sure would like McCain to stop running from the economy and make a clear, unambigous case why either of these buffons would absolutely ruin the economy. All either of these two have done is proposed HUGE new government spending, a war on capitalism and taxes beyond what anyone could envision. McCain needs to head them off at the pass and start now so that when they do get a nominee and the theme turns to “its the economy stupid” the voters will understand that the dems plan for ensuring that nobody ever has to worry about the economy again is simple, they would destroy it.
McCain is old and not in the best of health. The animosity between differant factions in the communist party are getting worse and worse.
What if the D was assassinated and McCain died of say a heart attack both between the end of September and election day.
What happens? I have looked and looked and can only come to the conclusion that the electoral college could keep George Bush or just select someone. Or would it fall to the Speaker of the House (God forbid)?
My bet is that the electoral college would be a bit disarrayed, and would not give any person 270 votes. In that case it would go to the House where each state’s delegation would vote as a block for their state for the new President.
According to Gov. Rendell (D-PA), Obama will lose PA because Democrats are racists.
“They have failed to articulate a critique of the wild Bush-era deregulation that has allowed the greed of banks to run amok.”
_______________________________________________________
Does anybody know what deregulation of the banking industry they are referring to here?
“Does anybody know what deregulation of the banking industry they are referring to here?
___________________________________________________________
I should have been clearer with the question I posted above. I’m not referring to “... the deregulatory process (that) was completed with passage of the Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994” but with the deregulation they say occured during the Bush administration. It seems to me that this is another case of blame Bush for everything.
Pols? Oh well its all decided then...
< /sarc >
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.