To: brityank
I have a file on this, although I don't have it handy. I'd thought that most of the charges were dismissed before prosecutions ever occurred?
I could be wrong about that, but if that's the case, I don't think the argument of over-agressive prosecution can hold up. That would indicate the extra bodies were assigned for oversight to make sure there weren't mistakes made.
5 posted on
03/26/2008 11:43:23 AM PDT by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Owl_Eagle
I'd thought that most of the charges were dismissed before prosecutions ever occurred? Check my link in #6.
Also:
The Secretary of Navy countermanded a determination by General James Mattis, USMC, ...
Mattis was following up and accepting the Investigating Officer's Recommendations, dropping or reducing charges as the testimony developed. He was replaced, and I believe some of the reason for that was the political involvement.
7 posted on
03/26/2008 11:51:34 AM PDT by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson