No one is as elitist as Hussein-Obama, who is smug, contemptuous, and so precious he won’t even “allow” Fox News to interview him. Hillary is scrappy and contentious, often voted with Bush. Barak has a lot of negative energy, seems passive-aggressive, a much more dangerous personality type, less trustworthy, more self-centered. He’d be a disaster for the country.
As for delegates, check the count. No matter what happens in the next several primaries, neither Hussein nor Clinton will have the requisite 2024 votes without Superdelegates being counted. The popular vote is very close. And if Michigan and Florida are counted, as they will be eventually, the margin is extremely slim. There’s no clear winner, so a floor fight will probably be the only way to resolve the nomination.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/
You missed my point. I don't care if an elitist is elected. The people can elect whoever they want. I care when self-appointed elitist connive to trump the votes of the people. Dems are famous for talking the "one man one vote" stuff - then turning around and putting themselves in positions to trump the vote of the people. Every person in Florida, Georgia, Vermont, New Mexico, Indiana, Kansas, Idaho, and New Hampshire can have their votes negated by the elites of the Democrat party. That's how powerful the "elitist insiders" are in the Democrat party. I have no idea why they even bother to have elections - guess it's window dressing. Or a way to pull the wool over the eyes of everyday dems. If the "not so super superdelegates trump the will of the people, there'll be problems. Unintended consequences - bad ones.