The way I see it, the disingenuous deserve no such courtesy, as they don't practice it themselves.
The way I see it, the disingenuous deserve no such courtesy, as they don't practice it themselves.
Many thanks for the clarification, but frankly, the whole thing is absurd on it's face.
No one walks into a cocktail party or restaurant and demands to know everything everyone has said about them at another table.
If I had wanted to "attack" someone behind their back I would have used Freepmail.
It should be noted that dealing with RobertPaulsen can be rocky at best and my comments were quixotically directed by way of a ping to someone who maintains a consistent dialogue with him.
I assumed they were publicly discoverable and would in fact be discovered.
It was not an "attack" it was a statement of fact.
RobertPaulsen is on record in his belief that small children should not have access to weapons.
The fact a DA in Ohio stated in an interview there is nothing illegal about a juvenile of "any age" in possession of a rifle might be enough to give him fits of apoplexy.
Bottom line, there is something fishy about all this, maybe we will learn what it is in the aftertimes.
Best regards,