No, really, I'm perfectly fine.
Posted on 03/31/2008 1:06:20 PM PDT by K-oneTexas
True. Though he has always had a Nero like nature about him — and she reminds us of Caligula.
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
She might or might not have a classifiable behavior. But, the condition appears to be stable.
Ping pong!
No, she’s evil. She cannot be permitted to plead insanity.
Narcissistic Disorder-A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:
has a grandiose sense of self-importance
is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
believes that he or she is "special" and unique
requires excessive admiration
has a sense of entitlement
is interpersonally exploitative
lacks empathy
is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her
shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes
Is a fat dog heavy?
Laughable...Hillary is not sick, rather she is cunning and smart. That is why I think Rush is playing with fire with his ego-building, merchandising, Operation Chaos.
Hillary is a power mad, money grubbing, inveterate liar willing to use the power of government to intimidate and destroy personal and political enemies. In other words, a trypical Washington beltway thug. However, compared to Hillary, Barack Obama, an Islamoracist, America hating, black separatist Sharia candidate; Hillary looks relatively normal. Also since the Democrat Party, even more extremist and kook fringe, now opposes Hillary because she isn’t left-wing extreme enough. Again, compared to Barack Farrakhan Obigot, the old Marxist rag muncher is now considered the political mainsteam. That is how far this country has fallen and moved to the extreme left 8 years after the last Clinton held power.
This author needs to learn the importance of brevity.
All that was necessary after the headline was “Yes”.
The two conditions are not mutually exclusive ... Although, as has been suggested previously on this thread:
More than anything else, Clinton (and Obama) are evil.
Hillary is “all in” for this race.
She has to be. She absolutely MUST win, there is no tomorrow.
She’s 60 now. If she loses to the upstart Obama, what does that say about her ability to handle a contested race. It’s not like her two victories for the senate from NY were hotly contested. She won in a walk, in 2000 to a weak Rick Lazio.
If McCain wins the general against Obama, she will have to run for her senate seat and campaign for president again in 2012.
If Obama wins the primary and in the general election, she’s out until 2016 at which time she will be 68.
So it’s all-in for Hillary. She simply must win at any, and all, costs. If it’s not her, then it’s going to be McCain.
It’s gong to become more desperate for Hillary! as the months pass leading up to the d’RATS convention. The dirt is going to fly and it WILL come down to the super-delegates. It must be Hillary, for she has said that it must be so, and so, it shall be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.