Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Radical revision of Tax Code and other US Codes ... radical excision (term limits AKA firing at the ballot box) of Liberal members in Congress.
1 posted on 04/02/2008 1:51:27 PM PDT by K-oneTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: K-oneTexas

The problem with deferred economic pain is that when the house of cards finally does tumble, it’ll be even worse than if we let it come down gradually.


2 posted on 04/02/2008 1:54:21 PM PDT by PeterFinn (I am not voting for McCain. No way, no how.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas
Yep, and a bunch of unelected appointees with extensive contacts on Wall Street have been given unlimited powers over the economic life of the average American.

And they have acted just like the ‘Management’ of this fictitious company. Prime the printing presses, a large order for degraded currency is in process.

6 posted on 04/02/2008 2:09:40 PM PDT by TCats (The Clintons Are Not Just Wrong - They Are Certifiable AND Dangerous! See my Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

Too many big words, the article is too long, and there are no references to Britney, American Idol, or “Lost”.

The Sheep will never read this.


7 posted on 04/02/2008 2:20:09 PM PDT by Old Sarge (CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

Thought that sounded like our government at work in the title!


8 posted on 04/02/2008 2:23:22 PM PDT by Chili Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

“Where does the Constitution authorize Congress to give away our money to anyone? Nowhere - that’s where.”

ehhh, not exactly true. Congress approves spending. Exclusively. Congress and Congress alone.

I’m definitely with you in sentiment, though, the Fed is absolutely NOT authorized to give away taxpayer money by authorizing a loan, losses or shortfalls in which will explicitly accrue to the Treasury, per Mr. Paulsen’s statement. It’s entirely extra-Constitutional....unless, of course, some “national security” implication is dreamed up post-facto regarding the need to make such a loan.

Personally, I would prefer not to construct “analogies” regarding this situation. It’s both as succinct as it can be and as complex as it need be just on statement of fact as the facts are.


9 posted on 04/02/2008 3:38:58 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (We've checked, and all your zeroes are OK. We're still working on your ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson